In a historic turn of events within Kenya’s National Assembly, Speaker Moses Wetangula on Tuesday announced the acceptance of a motion aimed at impeaching Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.
The motion, dated September 26 and received on September 27, was backed by an overwhelming majority of 291 members, far exceeding the 117 signatures required.Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse, the mover of the motion, stood before the assembly with a determined expression as he read out the names of the supporting members.
The atmosphere was charged with anticipation and tension, as the implications of such a motion could reshape the political landscape.
The motion is anchored on 11 grounds that outlined serious allegations against Gachagua, emphasizing violations of constitutional articles related to governance, integrity, and misconduct.
Among the specific accusations were:
1. Gross Violations of Constitutional Articles: Citing numerous sections, the motion alleged that Gachagua had fundamentally breached the principles of good governance and integrity as mandated by the Constitution.
2. Crimes Related to National Cohesion: There were serious accusations that Gachagua had engaged in activities that undermined national unity, as stipulated under the National Cohesion and Integration Act.
3. Corruption and Economic Crimes: The motion detailed suspicions of Gachagua’s involvement in corruption, referencing multiple sections of the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act and the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act.
4. Bullying and Misconduct: Gachagua was also accused of gross misconduct, including insubordination and bullying within the executive, which raised concerns about his leadership style and its impact on governance.
As the news spread, it sent ripples through the political corridors of power. Supporters of Gachagua rallied, emphasizing his contributions to the administration and warning against what they termed a politically motivated attack.
Opponents, however, celebrated the move as a necessary step towards accountability in leadership.
Speaker Wetangula’s declaration that the motion met constitutional requirements set the stage for a rigorous debate. Members of Parliament prepared for an intense session where emotions would run high, and alliances could shift.As the assembly prepares for the debate, the nation held its breath.
This motion was more than just a political maneuver; it represented the voices of citizens who demanded accountability from their leaders.
Whether the motion would lead to Gachagua’s removal or further entrench his position remained uncertain.
With the fate of DP Gachagua hanging in the balance, the country stand at a crossroads, where the principles of democracy and governance would be tested in the coming days.
The MPs are set to resume on Tuesday next for Gachagua to defend himself against the allegations of corruption amounting to over Sh 5.4 billion.
The outcome of this motion could not only redefine Gachagua’s political career but also set a precedent for the accountability of future leaders.
