<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Archives - Insider Bits News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/category/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/category/business/</link>
	<description>Stay Informed, Stay Ahead</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 10:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Kenya Airways Wins Four World Travel Awards</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/kenya-airways-wins-four-world-travel-awards/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 10:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Travel Awards]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=5096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kenya Airways has strengthened its position as one of Africa’s leading aviation brands after scooping four major honours at the 2026 World Travel Awards in Zanzibar, including the coveted Africa’s Leading Airline title. The national carrier beat major continental rivals to retain the top award during the 33rd World Travel Awards Africa and Indian Ocean [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/kenya-airways-wins-four-world-travel-awards/">Kenya Airways Wins Four World Travel Awards</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenya Airways has strengthened its position as one of Africa’s leading aviation brands after scooping four major honours at the 2026 World Travel Awards in Zanzibar, including the coveted Africa’s Leading Airline title.</p>
<p>The national carrier beat major continental rivals to retain the top award during the 33rd World Travel Awards Africa and Indian Ocean Gala Ceremony held in Zanzibar, Tanzania, on Friday, August 28.</p>
<p>KQ was also named Africa’s Leading Airline Economy Class 2026, while its flagship Pride Lounge at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport was crowned Africa’s Leading Airline Lounge.</p>
<p>Its inflight magazine, Msafiri, completed the four-award haul after being named Africa’s Leading Inflight Magazine 2026.</p>
<p>The honours recognise different parts of the passenger experience, from the airline’s overall proposition and economy cabin to the airport lounge and the magazine accompanying travellers during their journeys.</p>
<p>The overall airline award is particularly significant for KQ, which has retained the continental title for a third consecutive year, having also won it in 2024 and 2025.</p>
<p>The World Travel Awards listed Air Algérie, EgyptAir, Ethiopian Airlines, Kenya Airways, Royal Air Maroc, RwandAir, South African Airways, TAAG Angola Airlines and Tunisair among the nominees for the overall airline category.</p>
<p>Kenya Airways Acting Chief Executive Officer Capt. George Kamal said the recognition reflected the efforts of the airline&#8217;s employees and the confidence of its customers and industry partners.</p>
<p>“These awards are an important recognition of the commitment of our people and the confidence placed in Kenya Airways by our customers and industry partners. We are deeply grateful to the travellers and travel professionals whose confidence has made this recognition possible,” Kamal said.</p>
<p>The awards come as the national carrier continues efforts to strengthen its operations and expand its international footprint amid mounting pressures facing the global aviation industry.</p>
<p>Kenya Airways said it currently serves 45 destinations worldwide, including 37 in Africa. Through its membership of the SkyTeam Alliance and partnerships, the carrier gives customers access to more than 1,060 destinations in 173 countries.</p>
<p>KQ Chief Commercial and Customer Officer Julius Thairu said the four awards represented a vote of confidence in the airline&#8217;s role in connecting Africa to the rest of the world through its Nairobi hub.</p>
<p>“For Kenya Airways, the four awards are a vote of confidence in the airline’s role in connecting Africa to the world through its Nairobi hub and in the people, service and distinctly African hospitality behind the ‘Pride of Africa’ brand,” Thairu said.</p>
<p>The recognition also extends a strong run for Msafiri, which has now won the Africa’s Leading Inflight Magazine title for five consecutive years.</p>
<p>The publication has held the award since 2022.</p>
<p>The Pride Lounge award, meanwhile, gives KQ recognition beyond its aircraft, highlighting the airport experience it offers passengers travelling through its Nairobi hub.</p>
<p>KQ&#8217;s success in the economy-class category also marks a return to the top after EgyptAir won the award in 2025 and Ethiopian Airlines took it in 2024.</p>
<p>Kenya Airways previously won the economy-class title in 2023.</p>
<p>The airline&#8217;s latest haul comes against a difficult financial backdrop.</p>
<p>Kenya Airways reported a pre-tax loss of Sh15.92 billion for the first half of 2026, up from Sh12.17 billion during the same period last year.</p>
<p>The carrier has also been grappling with rising fuel costs, aircraft maintenance challenges and shortages of spare parts and engines.</p>
<p>The World Travel Awards recognition therefore offers KQ a significant boost at a time when it is seeking to improve its financial position and strengthen its competitiveness.</p>
<p>The awards were not, however, a clean sweep for Kenya Airways.</p>
<p>Ethiopian Airlines won Africa’s Leading Airline – Business Class, while RwandAir was named Africa’s Leading Cabin Crew.</p>
<p>Julius Nyerere International Airport in Tanzania was also named Africa’s Leading Airport.</p>
<p>Nairobi also emerged a winner, being named Africa’s Leading Business Travel Destination for the eighth consecutive year, further reinforcing the Kenyan capital&#8217;s position as a regional aviation and business hub.</p>
<p>For Kenya Airways, the Zanzibar ceremony provided recognition across several points of the passenger journey, from the aircraft cabin and lounge to the magazine and the airline&#8217;s wider brand.</p>
<p>The four trophies give the national carrier fresh recognition as it seeks to reinforce its Pride of Africa identity while navigating the financial and operational challenges confronting the airline.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/kenya-airways-wins-four-world-travel-awards/">Kenya Airways Wins Four World Travel Awards</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>KRA Raises Customs Benchmark to Sh3.2m to Seal Valuation Loopholes</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/kra-raises-customs-benchmark-to-sh3-2m-to-seal-valuation-loopholes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customs benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customs valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[import taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KRA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=5063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has raised the Customs Minimum Benchmark for general containerised consolidation cargo from Sh2.5 million to Sh3.2 million in a move aimed at curbing customs valuation loopholes. The new benchmark took effect on August 20, 2026, following consultations between KRA, the Kenya International Freight and Warehousing Association (KIFWA), small traders, cargo [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/kra-raises-customs-benchmark-to-sh3-2m-to-seal-valuation-loopholes/">KRA Raises Customs Benchmark to Sh3.2m to Seal Valuation Loopholes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has raised the Customs Minimum Benchmark for general containerised consolidation cargo from Sh2.5 million to Sh3.2 million in a move aimed at curbing customs valuation loopholes.</p>
<p>The new benchmark took effect on August 20, 2026, following consultations between KRA, the Kenya International Freight and Warehousing Association (KIFWA), small traders, cargo consolidators and other private-sector stakeholders.</p>
<p>KRA said the measure seeks to create a predictable and equitable customs valuation framework while preventing traders from gaining an unfair advantage through undervaluation and other forms of non-compliance.</p>
<p>“This is not about targeting small traders. It is about creating a level playing field where businesses compete fairly. A trader who declares goods correctly and pays the taxes due should not be disadvantaged by another trader who gains an unfair cost advantage through undervaluation, under-declaration or concealment of goods,” KRA said.</p>
<p>The Authority said cargo consolidation remains an important avenue for small traders to import goods by combining shipments in one container and reducing international trade costs.</p>
<p>However, KRA said the arrangement had been exploited through undervaluation, under-declaration, misdescription, misclassification and concealment of high-value goods, resulting in revenue losses and distorted competition.</p>
<p>High-value electronics, including smartphones, were cited as an example, with KRA warning that some goods could be declared as lower-value models to reduce customs duties and taxes.</p>
<p>The Authority stressed that the Sh3.2 million figure is a minimum reference point and not a flat valuation for every container.</p>
<p>“The KSh3.2 million benchmark does not mean that every container is valued at KSh3.2 million. If the actual value of the goods is higher, that value must be declared and the correct taxes paid. The benchmark is intended to strengthen valuation controls, not to provide a ceiling for the value of imported goods,” KRA said.</p>
<p>The previous Sh2.5 million benchmark had remained unchanged for about six years despite changes in economic conditions, import values and the nature of goods entering Kenya.</p>
<p>KRA said the new measure will also protect local manufacturers and legitimate businesses from competition created by undervalued imports.</p>
<p>“Fair competition requires businesses to compete on the basis of efficiency, quality and innovation, rather than through avoidance of taxes. Protecting the integrity of the customs system also protects compliant businesses and supports local manufacturing,” the Authority said.</p>
<p>KRA further reminded traders that compliance extends beyond customs clearance, requiring businesses selling goods in markets such as Eastleigh, Kamukunji, Nyamakima and Toy Market to meet applicable domestic tax obligations.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/kra-raises-customs-benchmark-to-sh3-2m-to-seal-valuation-loopholes/">KRA Raises Customs Benchmark to Sh3.2m to Seal Valuation Loopholes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activist Wants KCB CEO Suspended Over Sh146.3 Billion Funds</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/activist-wants-activist-wants-kcb-ceo-suspended-over-sh146-3-billion-funds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 13:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funds los probe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KCB Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KCB CEO Paul Russo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Activist Francis Awino has demanded immediate suspension of KCB chief executive Paul Russo pending an independent investigation into withholding €978,675,835 allegedly withheld by KCB officials. In a letter dated August 21, 2026, and addressed to the Chairman of KCB Group PLC, Awino raised concerns over the bank’s handling of approximately €978,675,835, equivalent to about Sh146.3 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/activist-wants-activist-wants-kcb-ceo-suspended-over-sh146-3-billion-funds/">Activist Wants KCB CEO Suspended Over Sh146.3 Billion Funds</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Activist Francis Awino has demanded immediate suspension of KCB chief executive Paul Russo pending an independent investigation into withholding €978,675,835 allegedly withheld by KCB officials.</p>
<p>In a letter dated August 21, 2026, and addressed to the Chairman of KCB Group PLC, Awino raised concerns over the bank’s handling of approximately €978,675,835, equivalent to about Sh146.3 billion.</p>
<p>The funds, according to the letter, were transmitted through UBS Switzerland AG for the benefit of Foxcapital Investment Limited but were subsequently placed under a “HELD – PRE-SETTLEMENT SUSPENSE” status under Incident No. KCB-FIN-IT-2026-0417.</p>
<p>Awino said the circumstances surrounding the funds warranted immediate intervention by the bank’s board and an independent inquiry.</p>
<p>“We hereby call upon the Chairman and the Board of Directors of KCB Group PLC to immediately suspend the Group Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Paul Russo, from the exercise of his executive functions pending an independent investigation into the circumstances surrounding the withholding and handling of the funds,” the letter states.</p>
<p>Awino said the demand was based on concerns over how the extraordinary amount came into KCB’s custody, why it was not credited to the intended beneficiary and the legal basis for its subsequent withholding.</p>
<p>“This demand is not made lightly,” he said, adding that the matter raised serious questions about internal decisions concerning the transaction and how it had subsequently been handled.</p>
<p>The activist further asked the board to establish when KCB received the funds, who authorised their placement in the suspense account and the precise reason for withholding them.</p>
<p>He also wants the bank to establish whether any regulatory or law-enforcement agency directed KCB to retain the money and whether the Financial Reporting Centre or Central Bank of Kenya issued any directive.</p>
<p>Other questions raised concern internal compliance and risk assessments, the officers responsible for the transaction, whether the funds generated interest or other financial benefit while being held, and whether anyone attempted to interfere with transaction records.</p>
<p>Awino also raised allegations that KCB personnel had recently been involved in attempts to delete, alter, suppress or otherwise interfere with electronic records relating to the transaction.</p>
<p>He demanded that all electronic and physical records be secured and preserved, including SWIFT messages, transaction records, ledger entries, audit trails, system logs, emails, compliance records and internal communications.</p>
<p>“If confirmed, such conduct would be extremely serious and would raise questions extending beyond ordinary corporate governance,” the letter states.</p>
<p>Awino urged the board to appoint an independent external forensic investigator with expertise in banking, financial crime compliance, information technology, SWIFT transactions and corporate governance.</p>
<p>He said the investigation should establish the complete chronology of the transaction, identify decision-makers and determine whether any individual breached the law, KCB’s internal policies, regulatory requirements or governance obligations.</p>
<p>The letter also demands that KCB establish whether any officer or employee acted contrary to court orders and investigate alleged attempts to delete, alter or suppress electronic records.</p>
<p>Awino warned that failure by the board to take immediate action could prompt him to pursue the matter before judicial, regulatory and investigative authorities, including the High Court, Central Bank of Kenya and Financial Reporting Centre.</p>
<p>“Our position is straightforward: No Chief Executive Officer should remain in full control of a regulated financial institution while serious and credible allegations concerning his administration are awaiting investigation,” he said.</p>
<p>He gave the KCB board seven days from receipt of the letter to provide a substantive response.</p>
<p>The letter was copied to KCB directors, the Central Bank of Kenya Governor and the Director of Bank Supervision.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/activist-wants-activist-wants-kcb-ceo-suspended-over-sh146-3-billion-funds/">Activist Wants KCB CEO Suspended Over Sh146.3 Billion Funds</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three bank CEOs shielded as court gives DPP 24 hours to verify High Court orders</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/three-bank-ceos-shielded-as-court-gives-dpp-24-hours-to-verify-high-court-orders/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 20:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Three top bank CEOs failed to appear before a Nairobi court on Tuesday after obtaining High Court orders stopping their prosecution over alleged failure to report suspicious transactions linked to Sh363.4 million. The three bank chiefs were due to appear before Milimani Chief Magistrate Gethi Kibiru to answer criminal charges after the Director of Public [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/three-bank-ceos-shielded-as-court-gives-dpp-24-hours-to-verify-high-court-orders/">Three bank CEOs shielded as court gives DPP 24 hours to verify High Court orders</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three top bank CEOs failed to appear before a Nairobi court on Tuesday after obtaining High Court orders stopping their prosecution over alleged failure to report suspicious transactions linked to Sh363.4 million.</p>
<p>The three bank chiefs were due to appear before Milimani Chief Magistrate Gethi Kibiru to answer criminal charges after the Director of Public Prosecutions approved their prosecution.</p>
<p>Instead, lawyers representing the executives told the magistrate that their clients had moved to the High Court on Friday August 7,2026 and obtained conservatory orders barring the lower court from proceeding with the criminal case.</p>
<p>The executives are NCBA Chief Executive Officer John Gachora, KCB Chief Executive Officer Paul Russo and Co-operative Bank Chief Executive Officer Gideon Muriuki.</p>
<p>The case also involves First Assurance Investment Ltd director Salim Mohammed Busaidy and the three banks.</p>
<p>The matter came up for mention on Tuesday  after the prosecution obtained summons requiring accused persons listed as numbers two to seven to appear before the magistrate for plea taking on over 114 criminal charges.</p>
<p>State counsel Willy Momanyi told the court that the summons had been served.</p>
<p>“The matter was coming up for mention. There were summons issued to No. 2 to 7 and I can confirm they were all served,” Momanyi said.</p>
<p>However, defence lawyers informed the court that the High Court had intervened and issued orders staying proceedings and restraining the arrest or prosecution of some of the accused persons.</p>
<p>For the Co-operative Bank and its CEO, lawyer holding brief for Gideon Muriuki and the bank, told the court that orders had been obtained from the High Court on Friday.</p>
<p>“On Friday we obtained conservatory orders from the High Court staying proceedings in this court and prohibition of arrest against the second and third accused person and a third order prohibiting this court from taking plea pending hearing and determination of this matter,” the lawyer said.</p>
<p>The defence further told the court that similar orders had been obtained in respect of other accused persons.</p>
<p>“For the third and fourth accused also obtained orders from the High Court restraining arrest, detention or continuation of any proceedings. They also obtained orders staying the operation of the summons,” the lawyer said.</p>
<p>The court was also told that orders had been issued concerning accused persons six and seven, staying further proceedings.</p>
<p>“For the 6 and 7 the High Court granted orders staying any further proceedings in this court or any other proceedings in this matter. All orders were served,” the defence said.</p>
<p>The defence consequently argued that the proceedings before the magistrate&#8217;s court had been stayed.</p>
<p>“In the circumstances these proceedings have been stayed,” the lawyer told the court.</p>
<p>But the prosecution said it had not received all the orders cited by the defence.</p>
<p>Momanyi told the court that the State had only been served with orders concerning KCB and its chief executive Paul Russo.</p>
<p>“We are yet to receive the orders the counsel has alluded to for the 2nd and 3rd and 6th and 7th but we received orders from Paul Russo and KCB Bank,” Momanyi said.</p>
<p>He asked the defence lawyers to serve the remaining orders so that the prosecution could verify their authenticity.</p>
<p>“We have asked the counsel to serve so that we can ascertain the authenticity of the orders which we have not been served,” he said.</p>
<p>The magistrate granted the prosecution more time to confirm service and authenticate the High Court orders before issuing further directions.</p>
<p>The matter will be mentioned on Wednesday August 12 to confirm whether all the orders have been served and verify their contents.</p>
<p>The High Court orders were issued by Justice Gregory Mutai in a petition filed by Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited and Gideon Muriuki against the DPP, the Director of Criminal Investigations and other parties.</p>
<p>The orders, issued on August 7, certified the application urgent and admitted it for hearing during the court recess.</p>
<p>Justice Mutai issued an interim conservatory order restraining the DPP and DCI from arresting, presenting for plea taking, charging or prosecuting the applicants in Milimani Criminal Case E451 of 2026.</p>
<p>The judge also stayed further proceedings in the criminal case pending the hearing of the application.</p>
<p>The High Court directed that the petition and applications be served on the respondents and interested parties and scheduled the matter for October 12 for compliance and further directions.</p>
<p>The criminal case stems from investigations into alleged financial irregularities involving First Assurance Investment Ltd.</p>
<p>According to the charge sheet dated August 3, 2026, Busaidy, Gachora, Russo and Muriuki face various charges including conspiracy to defraud, stealing, making documents without authority, failure to report suspicion regarding proceeds of crime and acquisition of proceeds of crime.</p>
<p>The prosecution alleges that the offences were committed between May 18, 2018 and April 30, 2024 in Nairobi.</p>
<p>One count alleges that Busaidy and Gachora conspired to defraud First Assurance Investment Ltd of Sh171,579,664.</p>
<p>Another conspiracy charge involving Busaidy and Russo concerns Sh136,329,745, while an additional allegation involving Busaidy and Muriuki relates to Sh55,411,050.</p>
<p>Busaidy separately faces an allegation of stealing Sh363,320,459 from First Assurance Investment Company Ltd.</p>
<p>The prosecution alleges that the money came into his possession by virtue of his position as a director and access to the company&#8217;s accounts held at Co-operative Bank, NCBA and KCB.</p>
<p>Russo and KCB are also accused of stealing Sh136,329,745 allegedly from a First Assurance account domiciled at KCB.</p>
<p>The three bank CEOs and their respective institutions further face allegations of failing to report suspicious or unusual transactions involving First Assurance accounts.</p>
<p>The prosecution alleges that Russo and KCB failed to report unusual transactions involving one account, while similar allegations have been made against Gachora and NCBA concerning another account.</p>
<p>The DPP alleges that the failure to report suspicion regarding proceeds of crime contravened Section 5 as read with Section 44(2) of the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act.</p>
<p>At an earlier appearance, Momanyi told the court that the State had no objection to the accused persons being released on bail or bond but sought conditions including surrender of passports and restrictions on contact with witnesses.</p>
<p>The prosecution also sought summons requiring accused persons two to seven to appear before the court.</p>
<p>The criminal allegations have not been proved and the accused persons remain innocent unless and until convicted by a court of law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/three-bank-ceos-shielded-as-court-gives-dpp-24-hours-to-verify-high-court-orders/">Three bank CEOs shielded as court gives DPP 24 hours to verify High Court orders</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadway Bakery Takes DFL Festive to Court Over Alleged Disparaging Ad</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/broadway-bakery-takes-dfl-festive-to-court-over-alleged-disparaging-ad/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadway Bakery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFL Festive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya Court News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Broadway Bakery Limited has sued rival bread maker DFL Festive Limited at the Milimani High Court, accusing the company of running a disparaging and misleading advertising campaign targeting its brand, products, and packaging. The commercial suit, filed on June 11, 2025, and listed under the court&#8217;s Commercial Division, names DFL Festive as the defendant and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/broadway-bakery-takes-dfl-festive-to-court-over-alleged-disparaging-ad/">Broadway Bakery Takes DFL Festive to Court Over Alleged Disparaging Ad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broadway Bakery Limited has sued rival bread maker DFL Festive Limited at the Milimani High Court, accusing the company of running a disparaging and misleading advertising campaign targeting its brand, products, and packaging.</p>
<p>The commercial suit, filed on June 11, 2025, and listed under the court&#8217;s Commercial Division, names DFL Festive as the defendant and seeks sweeping remedies including injunctions, a mandatory retraction order, and damages.</p>
<p>According to court documents, Broadway Bakery is asking the court for a declaration that the commercial advertisement on social and print media contained in a specific video online amounts to disparaging and misleading advertisement.</p>
<p>The plaintiff wants the Advertising Standards Body of Kenya to hear and determine its complaint, which it filed before the regulatory body on December 13, 2024, and is asking the High Court to direct that process to be handled expeditiously, efficient, and within the timelines that this Honourable Court shall deem fit and just, in accordance with the provisions of Article 47 of the Constitution, as read together with the Fair Administrative Actions Act, Cap 7L Laws of Kenya.</p>
<p>Broadway Bakery is also seeking a mandatory court order compelling DFL Festive to fully retract, delete or pull down the test and tenor of the video from the internet, including from all search engines such as Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and any other search engines where the disparaging and misleading advertisement may have been published.</p>
<p>At the heart of the dispute appears to be the use of the orange colour on wax paper bread packaging and the use of the word heritage when describing bread, details Broadway Bakery says belong to its brand identity.</p>
<p>The plaintiff is seeking a permanent injunction restraining DFL Festive from publishing and/or causing to be published or reposting any publication making reference to the orange colour for the wax paper packaging of bread and use of the word &#8216;heritage&#8217; when describing the bread across YouTube, Facebook, WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, TikTok, X, and any other social media platforms.</p>
<p>A separate permanent injunction is also being sought against Royal Media Services or any other print media from publishing or causing to be published the contested video.</p>
<p>Broadway Bakery is asking the court to award special damages, general damages for publication of disparaging and misleading advertisement against the Plaintiff,as well as exemplary and aggravated damages.</p>
<p>It is also seeking interest on those damages at Court rates from the date of Judgment until payment in full,plus costs of the suit.</p>
<p>The lawsuit comes against a backdrop of public intrigue surrounding the two companies.</p>
<p>Last year, eagle-eyed consumers flagged that both Broadway Bakery and DFL Festive&#8217;s packaging carried identical contact details, a coincidence that sparked widespread speculation on social media about whether the two rival bread brands were, in fact, related or under common ownership.</p>
<p>Neither company publicly addressed those claims at the time.</p>
<p>The matter is still ongoing before the Milimani High Court&#8217;s Commercial Division.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/broadway-bakery-takes-dfl-festive-to-court-over-alleged-disparaging-ad/">Broadway Bakery Takes DFL Festive to Court Over Alleged Disparaging Ad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tycoon Devani Sues KCB and Central Bank, Demands Full Accounting of 17-Year Receivership</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/tycoon-devani-sues-kcb-and-central-bank-demands-full-accounting-of-17-year-receivership/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Bank of Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya oil scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triton Petroleum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yagnesh Devani]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kenya&#8217;s most infamous oil scandal has ignited a stunning new legal firestorm. Yagnesh Mohanlal Devani, the embattled businessman at the heart of the Sh7.6 billion Triton Petroleum debacle, has filed a bombshell civil suit against Kenya Commercial Bank (KCB) and the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), demanding a comprehensive forensic accounting of every shilling handled [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/tycoon-devani-sues-kcb-and-central-bank-demands-full-accounting-of-17-year-receivership/">Tycoon Devani Sues KCB and Central Bank, Demands Full Accounting of 17-Year Receivership</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenya&#8217;s most infamous oil scandal has ignited a stunning new legal firestorm.</p>
<p>Yagnesh Mohanlal Devani, the embattled businessman at the heart of the Sh7.6 billion Triton Petroleum debacle, has filed a bombshell civil suit against Kenya Commercial Bank (KCB) and the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), demanding a comprehensive forensic accounting of every shilling handled during the company&#8217;s 17,year receivership.</p>
<p>In a dramatic reversal of fortunes, Devani once the hunted is now the one on the offensive.</p>
<p>Through his legal team, he is demanding a full and transparent reckoning of all assets, disposals, recoveries, and expenses incurred by the receiver managers appointed under KCB&#8217;s watch since Triton was placed under receivership in December 2008, at the request of KCB and the Eastern and Southern African Trade and Development Bank, citing Triton&#8217;s inability to pay loans.</p>
<p>The suit raises explosive questions: What happened to Triton&#8217;s assets during nearly two decades of receivership? Were creditors and shareholders given a fair account? Who benefited, and how much was recovered?</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">In his court papers, Devani claims that there are no comprehensive accounts that have been rendered to shareholders since the company was placed under receivership.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">The application alleges that there has been no clear disclosure on how Triton Petroleum’s assets were managed, disposed of, or how much was recovered during the period.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">Devani further claims that expenses incurred throughout the receivership have not been adequately explained.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">The businessman is also raising concerns over the conduct of the lenders and the regulator.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">He accuses the banks of failing to account for assets under their control, while the receivers are alleged to have breached their fiduciary and statutory obligations.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">The Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) is cited in the proceedings for allegedly failing to intervene despite its supervisory role over the banking sector.</p>
<p>The High Court has certified the matter as urgent and directed the respondents to file their responses within seven days.</p>
<p>Earlier, KCB had sued Triton for Sh2 billion for oil imports secured through various debentures, while Devani himself was sued for allegedly stealing Sh2.7 billion from the bank.</p>
<p>But with criminal charges now largely crumbling,the Sh7.6 billion EACC case was withdrawn after key witnesses, including former Energy Minister Kiraitu Murungi, were unwilling to testify, Devani appears to be pivoting aggressively to the civil arena.</p>
<p>At the peak of the scandal, Triton&#8217;s financiers, including KCB, Fortis Bank of Netherlands, Glencore Energy UK, and Emirates National Oil Corporation of Singapore, were left with paperwork and empty coffers.</p>
<p>Now, Devani&#8217;s audacious move threatens to pry open the books and expose what actually happened behind closed doors.</p>
<p>The lawsuit is set to send shockwaves through Kenya&#8217;s banking and regulatory establishment.</p>
<p>A forensic audit by PricewaterhouseCoopers had previously found that KPC irregularly released fuel in breach of the Collateral Financing Agreement,yet no full public accounting of the receivership period has ever been rendered.</p>
<p>Legal experts say the case could become the most consequential chapter yet in a saga that has defined corporate fraud in East Africa for nearly two decades.</p>
<p>If the court compels KCB and CBK to open their receivership books, it could expose uncomfortable truths long buried under legal proceedings.</p>
<p>The Triton saga, it seems, is far from over.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/tycoon-devani-sues-kcb-and-central-bank-demands-full-accounting-of-17-year-receivership/">Tycoon Devani Sues KCB and Central Bank, Demands Full Accounting of 17-Year Receivership</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equity Bank CEO Mwangi and his wife Suffers Major Blow in Bid to Retain Sh1 Billion Muthaiga Property</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/equity-bank-ceo-mwangi-and-his-wife-suffers-major-blow-in-bid-to-retain-sh1-billion-muthaiga-property/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 09:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeal Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment and Land Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity Bank CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Mwangi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Mwangi Equity Bank CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Wangui Mwangi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya land cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land ownership dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mount Pleasant Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muthaiga property dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property eviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sh1 billion property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trespass case]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Equity Bank Group CEO James Mwangi and his wife have suffered a major setback in their fight to retain a Sh1 billion property at Muthaiga after the Court of Appeal declined to halt a judgment that found they illegally acquired the prime land. The appellate court has instead ordered the couple to deposit Sh10 million [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/equity-bank-ceo-mwangi-and-his-wife-suffers-major-blow-in-bid-to-retain-sh1-billion-muthaiga-property/">Equity Bank CEO Mwangi and his wife Suffers Major Blow in Bid to Retain Sh1 Billion Muthaiga Property</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tVu25">
<div class="nH">
<div class="nH">
<div class="nH aqk aql bkL">
<div class="nH bkK">
<div class="nH">
<div class="nH ar4 z">
<div class="aeI">
<div class="AO">
<div id=":3" class="Tm aeJ bhAZTc">
<div id=":1" class="aeF">
<div class="nH">
<div class="nH" role="main">
<div class="nH g">
<div class="nH a98 iY">
<div class="nH">
<div class="aHU hx">
<div role="list">
<div class="h7 ie" tabindex="-1" role="listitem" aria-expanded="true">
<div class="Bk">
<div class="G3 G2">
<div>
<div id="avWBGd-46">
<div id="avWBGd-47">
<div class="adn ads" data-message-id="#msg-a:r3285299226405389545" data-legacy-message-id="19c2d1828d2aa90e">
<div class="gs">
<div class="">
<div id=":pz" class="ii gt">
<div id=":py" class="a3s aiL">
<div id="avWBGd-63">
<div dir="ltr">Equity Bank Group CEO James Mwangi and his wife have suffered a major setback in their fight to retain a Sh1 billion property at Muthaiga after the Court of Appeal declined to halt a judgment that found they illegally acquired the prime land.</p>
<p>The appellate court has instead ordered the couple to deposit Sh10 million as security while maintaining the status quo on the 3.733-acre disputed property even as police have already handed it over to its rightful owner, Mount Pleasant Limited.<br />
.<br />
The Court of Appeal, comprising Judges Daniel Musinga (President), Pauline Otieno Kiage, and Olive Muchelule issued the order on February 4, 2026, following an application by the Mwangi and his wife Jane Wangui Mwangi seeking to halt the execution of the Environment and Land Court judgment that ordered them to vacate the land after finding that they had unlawfully acquired the multi-billion prime land pending the hearing and determination of their appeal in the Sh1 billion land dispute.</p>
<p>&#8220;The status quo with regard to the suit property shall be maintained pending hearing and determination of the appeal, which we direct that it be expedited,&#8221; the Musinga led bench ruled.</p>
<p>&#8220;The applicant shall deposit a sum of Sh10 Million in an interest earning account in the joint names of counsel for the appellant(Mwangi) and the 1st respondent(Mount Pleasant Limited) within sixty (60) days from today.&#8221;</p>
<p>The orders came after the property had already been handed over to Mount Pleasant Limited.</p>
<p>According to a police report dated January 7, 2026, from Gigiri Police Station, the Environment and Land Court order to the couple vacate the property had been executed under supervision of the Officer Commanding Station (OCS) Gigiri, with Mount Pleasant Ltd gaining possession of the property.</p>
<p>&#8220;The above court order has been executed today the 07/01/2026 under supervision of the OCS Gigiri and now the plaintiff Mount Pleasant Ltd has now gained possession of the property,&#8221; stated Officer Commanding Police Station Jennifer Mutuku in the official police document.</p>
<p>Mwangi&#8217;s appeal follows a landmark judgment by Environment and Land Court Judge Oscar Angote delivered on October 23, 2025, which found that Mwangi and his wife had no legal claim to the prime Muthaiga property and had unlawfully taken possession of land belonging to Mount Pleasant Limited.</p>
<p>In his detailed 150-page ruling, Justice Angote found glaring irregularities in the documents presented by the couple, including missing volume references, unsigned land registry entries, and inconsistencies in file numbers, which rendered their alleged 2012 purchase from the late President Daniel arap Moi null and void.</p>
<p>Justice Angote declared that the land, originally registered as L.R 214/20/1/1 and L.R 214/20/2, and later irregularly amalgamated into L.R 214/832, belongs to a private company Mount Pleasant Limited, not Dr. Mwangi and his wife.</p>
<p>The judge ordered the couple to pay Sh10 million in general damages for trespass, with interest accruing from the date of judgment until full payment, and to vacate the property immediately under threat of police enforcement.</p>
<p>&#8220;An award does hereby issue of general damages for trespass, assessed at Sh 10 Million. The 1st and 2nd Defendants (Mwangi and his wife Wangui) to pay interest on the above amount at court rates from the date of this Judgment until payment in full. The 1st and 2nd Defendants&#8217; counterclaim is dismissed with costs. The 1st and 2nd Defendants to pay the Plaintiff the costs of the suit,&#8221; Justice Angote ruled.</p>
<p>The decision restored ownership of the 3.733-acre property to Mount Pleasant Ltd, which traced its acquisition back to former Cabinet Minister Arthur Kinyanjui Magugu and his wife, Margaret.</p>
<p>According to company records, Mount Pleasant purchased the property in 2006 for Sh 130 million after the Magugus redeemed it from the National Bank of Kenya.</p>
<p>Dr. Mwangi, however, insisted that he legally purchased the same land in 2012 directly from the late President Moi for Sh320 million, presenting a conveyance allegedly executed by the former Head of State.</p>
<p>Mwangi claimed he had taken possession of the land and initiated amalgamation and survey approvals to consolidate the parcels.</p>
<p>But Justice Angote concluded that President Moi had lost ownership of the parcels back in 1982 when he transferred them to the Magugus, whose title was subsequently conveyed to Mount Pleasant Ltd.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any subsequent transaction purporting to return the property to Moi or to sell it again is null and void,&#8221; the ruling states.</p>
<p>The judgment highlighted glaring irregularities in the documents produced by Dr. Mwangi, including missing volume references, unsigned land-registry entries, and inconsistent file numbers, which the court found rendered the alleged 2013 conveyance invalid.</p>
<p>The court observed that any attempt to reassign the property to Mwangi and his wife after it had been legally transferred to the Magugus in 1982, and subsequently to Mount Pleasant Limited, was invalid.</p>
<p>Consequently, the Chief Land Registrar and the National Land Commission were directed to expunge Mwangi&#8217;s title and restore the original ownership to Mount Pleasant Ltd.</p>
<p>Justice Angote further issued a permanent injunction barring the defendants, or their agents, from accessing or dealing with the property and ordered immediate vacation of the premises. Police assistance was authorized to enforce the eviction if necessary.</p>
<p>The court also awarded Mount Pleasant Ltd in profits of Sh500,000 per month from the date of unlawful occupation.</p>
<p>The case had been filed in 2020 by Mount Pleasant Ltd&#8217;s director, Anverali Mohamed Karmeli Amershi, against Equity CEO Mwangi, his wife, and others.</p>
<p>In his testimony before court, Amershi recounted how the company purchased the land from the Magugus, who had redeemed it from the National Bank of Kenya following a mortgage default.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our purchase price was Sh130 million. We took possession in 2006 and have been in continuous occupation since then,&#8221; Amershi testified.</p>
<p>&#8220;The defendants claim to have bought the land in 2012, but they never produced valid documentation to support that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amershi described repeated attempts by the Mwangi family to assert ownership, including alleged evictions of the company&#8217;s security personnel.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is not just about ownership; it&#8217;s about trespass and the unlawful takeover of property that does not belong to them,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Equity CEO Mwangi recounted his version of events in court, stating that he had purchased the property from the late President Moi in December 2012 and had paid a deposit of Sh32,060,000, with the balance of Sh200,000,000 completed thereafter.</p>
<p>He claimed that the former President personally &#8220;blessed&#8221; the sale at his Kabarnet Gardens residence.</p>
<p>&#8220;I conducted a search, verified all details, and completed a valuation before executing the agreement. By April 2013, the sale was complete,&#8221; Dr. Mwangi testified.</p>
<p>&#8220;We took possession, engaged security, and even constructed a boundary wall.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, the court noted that Mwangi failed to produce critical supporting documents, such as the alleged sale agreement with President Moi and evidence of payments for amalgamation and survey approvals.</p>
<p>The detailed judgment meticulously traced the ownership history of the parcels.Originally allocated to James Archibald Morrison during the colonial era, the land changed hands multiple times, ultimately being conveyed to the late President Moi by the 8th Duke of Portland&#8217;s estate in 1980.</p>
<p>Moi mortgaged the land to Standard Bank, which reconveyed it back to him in 1982 before selling it to the Magugus.</p>
<p>Mount Pleasant Ltd legally acquired the land from the Magugus in 2006, registering the transfer and paying all requisite stamp duties.</p>
<p>The company also applied for amalgamation of the two parcels and undertook sub-division approvals in compliance with Nairobi County regulations.</p>
<p>The Court of Appeal judges have listed Mwangi’s appeal for a case management conference within 30 days by which time the parties are expected to have filed their respective submissions, as well as their lists and bundles of authorities.</p></div>
<div class="adL"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/equity-bank-ceo-mwangi-and-his-wife-suffers-major-blow-in-bid-to-retain-sh1-billion-muthaiga-property/">Equity Bank CEO Mwangi and his wife Suffers Major Blow in Bid to Retain Sh1 Billion Muthaiga Property</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pride Inn, Bound by Religious Ban on Alcohol, Ordered to Pay Sh2.1 Million for Unpaid Drinks</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/pride-inn-bound-by-religious-ban-on-alcohol-ordered-to-pay-sh2-1-million-for-unpaid-drinks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 09:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol supply dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar management services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial contract ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeal Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex turpi causa doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotel alcohol policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya business litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral contract enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pride Inn Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious policy business case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sh2.1 million debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thatchmaanz Limited]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Pride Inn Limited, whose strict religious policy forbids handling alcoholic beverages, has been ordered by the Court of Appeal to pay Sh2,104,770 to Thatchmaanz Limited for supplying and managing alcohol at its Nairobi hotels. The three-judge bench comprising Justices W. Karanja, K. M&#8217;Inoti, and L. Achode dismissed Pride Inn&#8217;s appeal in a ruling that exposes [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/pride-inn-bound-by-religious-ban-on-alcohol-ordered-to-pay-sh2-1-million-for-unpaid-drinks/">Pride Inn, Bound by Religious Ban on Alcohol, Ordered to Pay Sh2.1 Million for Unpaid Drinks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn Limited, whose strict religious policy forbids handling alcoholic beverages, has been ordered by the Court of Appeal to pay Sh2,104,770 to Thatchmaanz Limited for supplying and managing alcohol at its Nairobi hotels.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The three-judge bench comprising Justices W. Karanja, K. M&#8217;Inoti, and L. Achode dismissed Pride Inn&#8217;s appeal in a ruling that exposes the tension between religious principles and commercial profit, finding that the hotel chain cannot escape debts from an arrangement it designed, approved, and profited from for seven months.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The judgment reveals how Pride Inn&#8217;s management devised an elaborate scheme to sell alcohol without physically handling it, allowing the company to boost revenues while theoretically maintaining its proprietors&#8217; religious sensibilities.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">But when payment became due, the hotel claimed the entire operation was unauthorized and illegal.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;The entire essence of this model was that the Defendant did not wish to handle the alcoholic beverages yet wanted to avail them to its customers and patrons,&#8221; the trial judge noted, capturing what critics may view as corporate hypocrisy dressed in religious garb.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The controversy began in early 2014 when Pride Inn&#8217;s strict no-alcohol policy created what the company acknowledged was a serious financial problem.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">According to Anthony Ngunga, who served as Pride Inn&#8217;s Chief Executive Officer from February to December 2014, the religious restriction had &#8220;adversely affected its revenue streams.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Court documents reveal that Ngunga held meetings with Pride Inn&#8217;s top leadership, including Chairman Shabir Kassam and Managing Director Hasnain Noorani, to discuss &#8220;the need to raise revenue for the appellant by allowing the sale of alcohol.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The solution they crafted was ingenious in its attempt to split moral responsibility from financial benefit.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Rather than abandon their religious stance or continue losing money, Pride Inn&#8217;s board approved bringing in a third party to handle all physical aspects of alcohol sales.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Ngunga testified that he proposed Edward Ahn, director of Thatchmaanz Limited, who had experience in the bar and restaurant industry.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">In April 2014, a meeting attended by Pride Inn&#8217;s Managing Director sealed the arrangement.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Under the oral agreement, Thatchmaanz would supply alcoholic beverages to Pride Inn&#8217;s Nairobi hotels, construct and operate bars, hire staff, and bill the hotel directly for alcohol consumed by customers.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn would impose a service charge on sales but would not touch the bottles or handle the money directly.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The contract was to run for three years, from May 2014 to May 2017, with renewal provisions to allow Thatchmaanz to recover its investment in bar construction and equipment.</p>
<h2><strong>The Operation: Bars, Staff, and Booming Business</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Thatchmaanz moved quickly. By the end of May 2014, the company had established a complete bar unit at Pride Inn&#8217;s Lantana Road location, stocked all Nairobi outlets with alcoholic beverages, and engaged qualified bar staff.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Operations commenced with what appeared to be full approval from Pride Inn&#8217;s management.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The business model seemed designed to satisfy everyone.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn&#8217;s proprietors could claim they didn&#8217;t &#8220;handle&#8221; alcohol while their hotels offered comprehensive bar services to customers.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Thatchmaanz would build a steady supply relationship with a premium hotel chain. Customers would enjoy drinks at Pride Inn establishments.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Moses Mahavi, who worked as Bar Manager for Thatchmaanz, testified that his duties included ensuring supply of alcoholic beverages whenever needed by Pride Inn&#8217;s hotels and restaurants.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;The appellant also required the respondent to supply alcoholic beverages to any of its guests outside of the main hotel premises, who required it, through the outside catering offered by the appellant,&#8221; he stated.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Evidence showed that suppliers delivered alcoholic beverages directly to Pride Inn&#8217;s premises, where they were verified by the hotel&#8217;s security officers who issued gate passes. Hotel staff conducted further verification.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The entire operation was integrated into Pride Inn&#8217;s business, from security protocols to customer service.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Michael Kimitho Kamau, Pride Inn&#8217;s General Manager at the time, corroborated this account.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">He testified that he was &#8220;aware that the directors of Pride Inn Hotels were in discussions to allow the sale of alcohol in the Nairobi units&#8221; and that &#8220;they entered into an agreement to allow an independent vendor to supply the alcohol to be sold in the units and in turn to be paid independently by the Hotel.&#8221;</p>
<h2><strong>When the Money Stopped Flowing</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The first signs of trouble emerged in July 2014,just two months into operations.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Despite alcohol flowing freely at Pride Inn establishments and revenue presumably increasing, invoices dating from May 19, 2014, remained unpaid.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Edward Ahn testified that he contacted Ngunga to query why payments had not been made despite repeated assurances.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Ngunga met with Kamau and requested him to prepare all invoices and send them to Pride Inn&#8217;s financial controller for &#8220;prompt settlement.&#8221; The settlement never came.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">By November 2014, with debts mounting and patience exhausted, Thatchmaanz threatened to terminate the arrangement. Ngunga asked Ahn to reconsider.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">In December 2014, a crucial meeting was held at Pride Inn&#8217;s Westlands office, attended by the hotel&#8217;s Managing Director Noorani, Chief Finance Officer, Ahn, and Ngunga.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">According to testimony, the meeting resolved that outstanding invoices totaling approximately Sh1,500,000 would be settled within one week, and Thatchmaanz would continue supplying alcoholic drinks and running the bars.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">On December 2, 2014, just days after this meeting, Ngunga ceased employment with Pride Inn. The promised payment never materialized.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">On December 16, 2014, Pride Inn made a partial payment of Sh322,200 by cheque,an amount that would later prove crucial in establishing the hotel&#8217;s acknowledgment of the debt. But that was all Thatchmaanz would receive.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">By the time operations ceased, unpaid invoices totaled Sh2,104,770. Thatchmaanz had also invested Sh1,000,000 in bar construction and equipment, plus Sh648,000 in staff salaries.</p>
<h2 class="text-text-100 mt-3 -mb-1 text-[1.125rem] font-bold"><strong>The Defense: &#8220;We Never Authorized This&#8221;</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">When sued in the High Court, Pride Inn mounted a defense that struck at the foundations of the arrangement its own board had approved.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The hotel claimed any purported contract with Thatchmaanz was undertaken without company authority and could not bind it.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Nicholas Ochieng, Pride Inn&#8217;s General Manager, provided the company&#8217;s official position: &#8220;It was the company&#8217;s policy not to engage in the sale of alcoholic beverages in any of its hotel branches and at no point did the company obtain a license as required by law to sell alcoholic beverages in its premises as alleged by the respondent.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">He added that if Thatchmaanz had entered into an oral contract with Ngunga, &#8220;then that was a private agreement that the company was not privy to and therefore, is not bound by it.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn also invoked the legal doctrine of ex turpi causa non oritur actio—the principle that courts should not enforce illegal contracts.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The hotel argued the arrangement was illegal because its premises were not licensed to sell alcohol under the Nairobi City County Alcoholic Drinks Control and Licensing Act, 2014.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The irony was sharp: Pride Inn was simultaneously claiming it never authorized alcohol sales while arguing those very sales were illegal.</p>
<h2 class="text-text-100 mt-3 -mb-1 text-[1.125rem] font-bold"><strong>The Inconvenient Evidence</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn&#8217;s defense faced several devastating problems. First, the hotel conspicuously failed to call Managing Director Hasnain Noorani to testify, despite him being identified as a key participant in the April 2014 meeting that birthed the arrangement and the December 2014 meeting that promised payment.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;The unrebutted testimonies of PW1 and PW2, coupled with evidence of performance including the establishment of the bar complete with barmen, stocking of beverages, and a part-payment in the form of a cheque of Kshs. 322,000 issued by the appellant, support the existence of an oral agreement,&#8221; the Court of Appeal noted.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Second, evidence showed that Pride Inn&#8217;s own General Manager, Kamau, had visited Nairobi City Hall in May 2014 to obtain licenses for the units to sell alcohol.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">He paid inspection fees and received a receipt dated February 4, 2015. Kamau testified that they were told the Alcohol Licensing Board had not yet been formed but were advised to pay fees and proceed with sales pending the Board&#8217;s appointment.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Third, the partial payment of Sh322,200 contradicted Pride Inn&#8217;s claim of non-authorization.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Courts recognize that partial payment typically constitutes acknowledgment of debt.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Fourth, and perhaps most damning, Thatchmaanz presented evidence that after terminating the arrangement, Pride Inn hired Thatchmaanz&#8217;s former Bar Manager, Moses Mahavi, to continue running the bar at Lantana Road. Ahn testified that &#8220;the appellant continues to operate the business of selling alcoholic drinks.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">This evidence painted a picture of a company that approved alcohol sales at the highest level, benefited from them financially, made partial payment acknowledging the debt, continued the business after the dispute—but refused to pay the supplier who made it all possible.</p>
<h2 class="text-text-100 mt-3 -mb-1 text-[1.125rem] font-bold"><strong>The Court&#8217;s Verdict: You Can&#8217;t Have It Both Ways</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The High Court, presided over by Justice Tuiyott, ruled in favor of Thatchmaanz in February 2019, awarding Sh2,104,770 plus interest. Pride Inn appealed to the Court of Appeal.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The appellate judges began by addressing whether a valid contract existed.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">They outlined requirements for oral contracts: valid and legally enforceable terms, essential elements like offer and acceptance, and compliance with laws and regulations.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;Going by the conduct of the parties herein, and having regard to the common course of natural events and human conduct in relation to the prevailing facts of this particular case, we are convinced that there was an orally binding contract between the appellant and the respondent,&#8221; the Court of Appeal declared.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The judges found that the arrangement was not a conventional sale of goods but rather &#8220;a hybrid commercial arrangement &#8211; a service and supply contract, designed to allow the appellant to offer alcohol to patrons without violating its internal restrictions.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">This finding rejected Pride Inn&#8217;s argument that the Sale of Goods Act applied and had been violated.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">On the illegality argument, the court was equally unimpressed.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;The duty to obtain the licence lay with the appellant, since the sale occurred within its premises and for the benefit of its clientele,&#8221; the judges ruled.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">They noted that Pride Inn&#8217;s own General Manager had taken steps to obtain licenses, and that Section 56(b) of the relevant Act allowed a nine-month transitional period for compliance.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The County Government had allowed Pride Inn to proceed with sales pending appointment of the Licensing Board.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;In our view, the appellant cannot rely on the doctrine of &#8216;ex turpi causa non oritur actio&#8217; where it has been proved that the duty was upon it to ensure that it had obtained the licence before it allowed the sale of alcoholic beverages in its premises,&#8221; the court stated.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The judges characterized the absence of a license as &#8220;a regulatory lapse for which the appellant bore responsibility&#8221; rather than fundamental illegality that would void the contract.</p>
<h2 class="text-text-100 mt-3 -mb-1 text-[1.125rem] font-bold"><strong>The Message: Religious Principles Don&#8217;t Trump Legal Obligations</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The Court of Appeal&#8217;s ruling sends a clear message about corporate accountability. Companies cannot structure elaborate arrangements to achieve moral distance from activities their principles prohibit, profit substantially from those activities, and then invoke those same principles to escape financial obligations.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The judgment also addresses the limits of the ex turpi causa defense. A party cannot claim a contract is illegal due to missing licenses when that party bore the duty to obtain those licenses, took steps to do so, and was given transitional permission by authorities.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">On damages, the court found that Thatchmaanz had &#8220;not only pleaded special damages but also strictly proved them&#8221; through unpaid invoices totaling Sh2,104,770 covering the period from May to December 2014.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn&#8217;s final gambit, attempting to hold Anthony Ngunga personally liable through third-party proceedings also failed.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The court noted that Pride Inn had sought leave to serve the third-party notice by substituted service but never filed the required application or effected service.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;There is no evidence that third-party proceedings were prosecuted in the trial court,&#8221; the judges observed.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn Limited has been ordered to pay the full judgment amount of Sh2,104,770 plus costs and interest to Thatchmaanz Limited, bringing closure to a dispute that began when the hotel&#8217;s bar taps were flowing but its payments had run dry.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/pride-inn-bound-by-religious-ban-on-alcohol-ordered-to-pay-sh2-1-million-for-unpaid-drinks/">Pride Inn, Bound by Religious Ban on Alcohol, Ordered to Pay Sh2.1 Million for Unpaid Drinks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBK Warns Against Using Banknotes for Bouquets, Decorations Ahead of Valentine’s Day</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/cbk-warns-against-using-banknotes-for-bouquets-decorations-ahead-of-valentines-day/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 17:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banknotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Bank of Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[currency warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decorative cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defacing currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya Shilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money bouquets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine’s Day]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Central Bank of Kenya has issued a stern warning to the public over the increasing use of banknotes in decorative arrangements, saying the practice violates the law and undermines the integrity of the national currency. In a public notice dated February 2, 2026, the regulator expressed concern over a rising trend where Kenya Shilling [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/cbk-warns-against-using-banknotes-for-bouquets-decorations-ahead-of-valentines-day/">CBK Warns Against Using Banknotes for Bouquets, Decorations Ahead of Valentine’s Day</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Central Bank of Kenya has issued a stern warning to the public over the increasing use of banknotes in decorative arrangements, saying the practice violates the law and undermines the integrity of the national currency.</p>
<p>In a public notice dated February 2, 2026, the regulator expressed concern over a rising trend where Kenya Shilling notes are being folded, glued, stapled, and pinned together to create cash flower bouquets, money arrangements, and ornamental displays, particularly during celebrations such as Valentine&#8217;s Day.</p>
<p>The Bank said such practices render banknotes unfit for circulation and interfere with automated banking systems.</p>
<p>&#8220;The use of adhesives, pins, staples, and similar materials damages banknotes and interferes with the efficient operation of cash-handling and processing equipment, including automated teller machines (ATMs), cash counting machines, and sorting equipment,&#8221; CBK stated in the notice.</p>
<p>The regulator added that damaged currency leads to increased rejection rates during processing and forces premature withdrawal and replacement of notes, creating unnecessary costs for both the public and the Bank.</p>
<p>While acknowledging that giving cash as a gift is acceptable, CBK emphasized that the presentation method must not compromise the currency&#8217;s condition.</p>
<p>&#8220;CBK does not object to the use of cash as a gift, such use should not involve any action that alters, damages, or defaces banknotes,&#8221; the notice read.</p>
<p>The Bank stressed that currency must remain capable of performing its essential functions as a medium of exchange, unit of account, and store of value.</p>
<p>CBK also reminded Kenyans that defacing currency is a criminal offense under Section 367 of the Penal Code.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any person who willfully defaces, mutilates, or in any way impairs any currency note issued by lawful authority commits an offence under the Penal Code,&#8221; the notice warned.</p>
<p>The regulator has called on the public to adopt alternative methods of presenting monetary gifts that do not damage banknotes.</p>
<p>&#8220;CBK therefore urges the public to refrain from practices that compromise the integrity of Kenya Shilling banknotes and to adopt alternative, non-damaging methods when presenting monetary gifts,&#8221; the statement said.</p>
<p>The Central Bank said it will continue public awareness campaigns and stakeholder engagement to protect the quality and public confidence in Kenya Shilling banknotes.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/cbk-warns-against-using-banknotes-for-bouquets-decorations-ahead-of-valentines-day/">CBK Warns Against Using Banknotes for Bouquets, Decorations Ahead of Valentine’s Day</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Win for Musician Nonini as High Court Upholds Sh4M Copyright Award</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/big-win-for-musician-nonini-as-high-court-upholds-sh4m-copyright-award/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 17:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Mutinda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubert Nakitare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sylvix Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wee Kamu]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4523</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It is a big win for Genge music icon Nonini after the High Court upheld a Sh 4 million award against Sylvix Electronics for illegally using his song &#8220;Wee Kamu.&#8221; In alandmark judgment by Justice Linus P Kassan not only maintained the substantial damages for the artist born Hubert Nakitare but also set important precedents [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/big-win-for-musician-nonini-as-high-court-upholds-sh4m-copyright-award/">Big Win for Musician Nonini as High Court Upholds Sh4M Copyright Award</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a big win for Genge music icon Nonini after the High Court upheld a Sh 4 million award against Sylvix Electronics for illegally using his song &#8220;Wee Kamu.&#8221;</p>
<p>In alandmark judgment by Justice Linus P Kassan not only maintained the substantial damages for the artist born Hubert Nakitare but also set important precedents about who bears responsibility when copyrighted material is published without authorization on social media platforms.</p>
<p>While content creator Brian Mutinda walked away cleared of liability, the ruling represents a major win for Nonini and the broader creative industry in protecting intellectual property rights.</p>
<p>The facts of the infringement were never in dispute.</p>
<p>A video featuring Nonini&#8217;s popular track had been posted on Sylvix Electronics&#8217; social media account without the musician&#8217;s consent, clearly violating his exclusive rights to control how his music is used.</p>
<p>Justice Kassan was unequivocal about the violation that: &#8220;The evidence on record clearly indicate that the Plaintiff&#8217;s song had a copyright or license which was infringed. This is not disputed by either of the parties.&#8221;</p>
<p>The court heard that Nonini had properly registered his copyright for &#8220;Wee Kamu&#8221; and produced a certificate proving his ownership.</p>
<p>&#8220;The song &#8216;Wee Kamu&#8217; belonged to the Plaintiff and he produced a certificate to prove this,&#8221; the judge confirmed.</p>
<p>The disputed video, which was screened during court proceedings, depicted Mutinda welcoming a lady to watch a branded television screen while Nonini&#8217;s song played in the background, featuring the lyrics &#8220;leo niko kwa keja sitoki hapa, kwa hivyo ukitaka wee kamu.&#8221;</p>
<p>What made this case particularly significant was the court&#8217;s analysis of who should bear responsibility when content is modified and published on digital platforms.</p>
<p>The video appeared on Sylvix Electronics&#8217; account, not on Mutinda&#8217;s personal social media. This distinction proved critical to the court&#8217;s reasoning.</p>
<p>Justice Kassan posed the central question: &#8220;Does the 1st Appellant( the content creator0 have authority to post videos to the 2nd Respondent electronic account?&#8221;</p>
<p>The answer shaped the entire judgment. Without evidence that Mutinda controlled Sylvix Electronics&#8217; social media presence or authorized the posting, the court found it unjust to hold him personally liable.</p>
<p>&#8220;This therefore means that the Appellant did not have control on the 2nd Defendant account and this being the case, the 2nd Defendant can post anything he/it wants,&#8221; Justice Kassan found.</p>
<p>&#8220;Should the Appellant be punished for what the 2nd Defendant has posted in its account?&#8221;The judge then posed.<br />
C<br />
The ruling has significant implications for Kenya&#8217;s booming content creation industry.</p>
<p>Justice Kassan warned that holding creators liable for unauthorized modifications by third parties could stifle creative expression.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is true that in this era of technology, many young men and women are engaging into the business of content creation,&#8221; the judge observed.</p>
<p>&#8220;If their contents are synchronized and posted illegally by other institutions without their consent, should they still be found liable?</p>
<p>To me, this will greatly affect art or music in general.&#8221;</p>
<p>The court rejected the trial magistrate&#8217;s conclusion that Mutinda must have added the song simply because he appeared in the video, calling such reasoning &#8220;subjective and imagination that is bereft of evidence.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a particularly memorable phrase, Justice Kassan added: &#8220;no one, even the devil can read the mind of a man.&#8221;</p>
<p>While clearing Mutinda, the High Court maintained the full Sh 4 million award against Sylvix Electronics, finding it both reasonable and appropriate.</p>
<p>&#8220;The conclusion of the above is that this Appeal succeeds as against the Appellant,&#8221; Justice Kassan ruled, before directing that &#8220;this award shall only be against the 2nd Respondent.&#8221;</p>
<p>The company was also ordered to pay the costs of the appeal, compounding its financial liability.</p>
<p>Critically, Sylvix Electronics failed to participate in either the original proceedings or the appeal, leaving unanswered how Nonini&#8217;s copyrighted song ended up synchronized with content on its platform.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Second Defendant did not participate in the lower Court proceedings and in this Appeal,&#8221; the judge noted.</p>
<p>For Nonini, one of the architects of Kenya&#8217;s Genge music movement, the judgment validates years of advocacy for stronger artist protections.</p>
<p>The Sh 4 million award sends a clear message that Kenyan courts will enforce copyright laws and impose meaningful penalties on violators.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/big-win-for-musician-nonini-as-high-court-upholds-sh4m-copyright-award/">Big Win for Musician Nonini as High Court Upholds Sh4M Copyright Award</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
