<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Archives - Insider Bits News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/category/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/category/business/</link>
	<description>Stay Informed, Stay Ahead</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Broadway Bakery Takes DFL Festive to Court Over Alleged Disparaging Ad</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/broadway-bakery-takes-dfl-festive-to-court-over-alleged-disparaging-ad/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadway Bakery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFL Festive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya Court News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Broadway Bakery Limited has sued rival bread maker DFL Festive Limited at the Milimani High Court, accusing the company of running a disparaging and misleading advertising campaign targeting its brand, products, and packaging. The commercial suit, filed on June 11, 2025, and listed under the court&#8217;s Commercial Division, names DFL Festive as the defendant and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/broadway-bakery-takes-dfl-festive-to-court-over-alleged-disparaging-ad/">Broadway Bakery Takes DFL Festive to Court Over Alleged Disparaging Ad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broadway Bakery Limited has sued rival bread maker DFL Festive Limited at the Milimani High Court, accusing the company of running a disparaging and misleading advertising campaign targeting its brand, products, and packaging.</p>
<p>The commercial suit, filed on June 11, 2025, and listed under the court&#8217;s Commercial Division, names DFL Festive as the defendant and seeks sweeping remedies including injunctions, a mandatory retraction order, and damages.</p>
<p>According to court documents, Broadway Bakery is asking the court for a declaration that the commercial advertisement on social and print media contained in a specific video online amounts to disparaging and misleading advertisement.</p>
<p>The plaintiff wants the Advertising Standards Body of Kenya to hear and determine its complaint, which it filed before the regulatory body on December 13, 2024, and is asking the High Court to direct that process to be handled expeditiously, efficient, and within the timelines that this Honourable Court shall deem fit and just, in accordance with the provisions of Article 47 of the Constitution, as read together with the Fair Administrative Actions Act, Cap 7L Laws of Kenya.</p>
<p>Broadway Bakery is also seeking a mandatory court order compelling DFL Festive to fully retract, delete or pull down the test and tenor of the video from the internet, including from all search engines such as Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and any other search engines where the disparaging and misleading advertisement may have been published.</p>
<p>At the heart of the dispute appears to be the use of the orange colour on wax paper bread packaging and the use of the word heritage when describing bread, details Broadway Bakery says belong to its brand identity.</p>
<p>The plaintiff is seeking a permanent injunction restraining DFL Festive from publishing and/or causing to be published or reposting any publication making reference to the orange colour for the wax paper packaging of bread and use of the word &#8216;heritage&#8217; when describing the bread across YouTube, Facebook, WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, TikTok, X, and any other social media platforms.</p>
<p>A separate permanent injunction is also being sought against Royal Media Services or any other print media from publishing or causing to be published the contested video.</p>
<p>Broadway Bakery is asking the court to award special damages, general damages for publication of disparaging and misleading advertisement against the Plaintiff,as well as exemplary and aggravated damages.</p>
<p>It is also seeking interest on those damages at Court rates from the date of Judgment until payment in full,plus costs of the suit.</p>
<p>The lawsuit comes against a backdrop of public intrigue surrounding the two companies.</p>
<p>Last year, eagle-eyed consumers flagged that both Broadway Bakery and DFL Festive&#8217;s packaging carried identical contact details, a coincidence that sparked widespread speculation on social media about whether the two rival bread brands were, in fact, related or under common ownership.</p>
<p>Neither company publicly addressed those claims at the time.</p>
<p>The matter is still ongoing before the Milimani High Court&#8217;s Commercial Division.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/broadway-bakery-takes-dfl-festive-to-court-over-alleged-disparaging-ad/">Broadway Bakery Takes DFL Festive to Court Over Alleged Disparaging Ad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tycoon Devani Sues KCB and Central Bank, Demands Full Accounting of 17-Year Receivership</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/tycoon-devani-sues-kcb-and-central-bank-demands-full-accounting-of-17-year-receivership/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Bank of Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KCB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya oil scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triton Petroleum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yagnesh Devani]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kenya&#8217;s most infamous oil scandal has ignited a stunning new legal firestorm. Yagnesh Mohanlal Devani, the embattled businessman at the heart of the Sh7.6 billion Triton Petroleum debacle, has filed a bombshell civil suit against Kenya Commercial Bank (KCB) and the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), demanding a comprehensive forensic accounting of every shilling handled [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/tycoon-devani-sues-kcb-and-central-bank-demands-full-accounting-of-17-year-receivership/">Tycoon Devani Sues KCB and Central Bank, Demands Full Accounting of 17-Year Receivership</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenya&#8217;s most infamous oil scandal has ignited a stunning new legal firestorm.</p>
<p>Yagnesh Mohanlal Devani, the embattled businessman at the heart of the Sh7.6 billion Triton Petroleum debacle, has filed a bombshell civil suit against Kenya Commercial Bank (KCB) and the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), demanding a comprehensive forensic accounting of every shilling handled during the company&#8217;s 17,year receivership.</p>
<p>In a dramatic reversal of fortunes, Devani once the hunted is now the one on the offensive.</p>
<p>Through his legal team, he is demanding a full and transparent reckoning of all assets, disposals, recoveries, and expenses incurred by the receiver managers appointed under KCB&#8217;s watch since Triton was placed under receivership in December 2008, at the request of KCB and the Eastern and Southern African Trade and Development Bank, citing Triton&#8217;s inability to pay loans.</p>
<p>The suit raises explosive questions: What happened to Triton&#8217;s assets during nearly two decades of receivership? Were creditors and shareholders given a fair account? Who benefited, and how much was recovered?</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">In his court papers, Devani claims that there are no comprehensive accounts that have been rendered to shareholders since the company was placed under receivership.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">The application alleges that there has been no clear disclosure on how Triton Petroleum’s assets were managed, disposed of, or how much was recovered during the period.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">Devani further claims that expenses incurred throughout the receivership have not been adequately explained.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">The businessman is also raising concerns over the conduct of the lenders and the regulator.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">He accuses the banks of failing to account for assets under their control, while the receivers are alleged to have breached their fiduciary and statutory obligations.</p>
<p style="font-weight: 500;">The Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) is cited in the proceedings for allegedly failing to intervene despite its supervisory role over the banking sector.</p>
<p>The High Court has certified the matter as urgent and directed the respondents to file their responses within seven days.</p>
<p>Earlier, KCB had sued Triton for Sh2 billion for oil imports secured through various debentures, while Devani himself was sued for allegedly stealing Sh2.7 billion from the bank.</p>
<p>But with criminal charges now largely crumbling,the Sh7.6 billion EACC case was withdrawn after key witnesses, including former Energy Minister Kiraitu Murungi, were unwilling to testify, Devani appears to be pivoting aggressively to the civil arena.</p>
<p>At the peak of the scandal, Triton&#8217;s financiers, including KCB, Fortis Bank of Netherlands, Glencore Energy UK, and Emirates National Oil Corporation of Singapore, were left with paperwork and empty coffers.</p>
<p>Now, Devani&#8217;s audacious move threatens to pry open the books and expose what actually happened behind closed doors.</p>
<p>The lawsuit is set to send shockwaves through Kenya&#8217;s banking and regulatory establishment.</p>
<p>A forensic audit by PricewaterhouseCoopers had previously found that KPC irregularly released fuel in breach of the Collateral Financing Agreement,yet no full public accounting of the receivership period has ever been rendered.</p>
<p>Legal experts say the case could become the most consequential chapter yet in a saga that has defined corporate fraud in East Africa for nearly two decades.</p>
<p>If the court compels KCB and CBK to open their receivership books, it could expose uncomfortable truths long buried under legal proceedings.</p>
<p>The Triton saga, it seems, is far from over.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/tycoon-devani-sues-kcb-and-central-bank-demands-full-accounting-of-17-year-receivership/">Tycoon Devani Sues KCB and Central Bank, Demands Full Accounting of 17-Year Receivership</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equity Bank CEO Mwangi and his wife Suffers Major Blow in Bid to Retain Sh1 Billion Muthaiga Property</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/equity-bank-ceo-mwangi-and-his-wife-suffers-major-blow-in-bid-to-retain-sh1-billion-muthaiga-property/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 09:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeal Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment and Land Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity Bank CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Mwangi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Mwangi Equity Bank CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Wangui Mwangi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya land cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land ownership dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mount Pleasant Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muthaiga property dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property eviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sh1 billion property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trespass case]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Equity Bank Group CEO James Mwangi and his wife have suffered a major setback in their fight to retain a Sh1 billion property at Muthaiga after the Court of Appeal declined to halt a judgment that found they illegally acquired the prime land. The appellate court has instead ordered the couple to deposit Sh10 million [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/equity-bank-ceo-mwangi-and-his-wife-suffers-major-blow-in-bid-to-retain-sh1-billion-muthaiga-property/">Equity Bank CEO Mwangi and his wife Suffers Major Blow in Bid to Retain Sh1 Billion Muthaiga Property</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tVu25">
<div class="nH">
<div class="nH">
<div class="nH aqk aql bkL">
<div class="nH bkK">
<div class="nH">
<div class="nH ar4 z">
<div class="aeI">
<div class="AO">
<div id=":3" class="Tm aeJ bhAZTc">
<div id=":1" class="aeF">
<div class="nH">
<div class="nH" role="main">
<div class="nH g">
<div class="nH a98 iY">
<div class="nH">
<div class="aHU hx">
<div role="list">
<div class="h7 ie" tabindex="-1" role="listitem" aria-expanded="true">
<div class="Bk">
<div class="G3 G2">
<div>
<div id="avWBGd-46">
<div id="avWBGd-47">
<div class="adn ads" data-message-id="#msg-a:r3285299226405389545" data-legacy-message-id="19c2d1828d2aa90e">
<div class="gs">
<div class="">
<div id=":pz" class="ii gt">
<div id=":py" class="a3s aiL">
<div id="avWBGd-63">
<div dir="ltr">Equity Bank Group CEO James Mwangi and his wife have suffered a major setback in their fight to retain a Sh1 billion property at Muthaiga after the Court of Appeal declined to halt a judgment that found they illegally acquired the prime land.</p>
<p>The appellate court has instead ordered the couple to deposit Sh10 million as security while maintaining the status quo on the 3.733-acre disputed property even as police have already handed it over to its rightful owner, Mount Pleasant Limited.<br />
.<br />
The Court of Appeal, comprising Judges Daniel Musinga (President), Pauline Otieno Kiage, and Olive Muchelule issued the order on February 4, 2026, following an application by the Mwangi and his wife Jane Wangui Mwangi seeking to halt the execution of the Environment and Land Court judgment that ordered them to vacate the land after finding that they had unlawfully acquired the multi-billion prime land pending the hearing and determination of their appeal in the Sh1 billion land dispute.</p>
<p>&#8220;The status quo with regard to the suit property shall be maintained pending hearing and determination of the appeal, which we direct that it be expedited,&#8221; the Musinga led bench ruled.</p>
<p>&#8220;The applicant shall deposit a sum of Sh10 Million in an interest earning account in the joint names of counsel for the appellant(Mwangi) and the 1st respondent(Mount Pleasant Limited) within sixty (60) days from today.&#8221;</p>
<p>The orders came after the property had already been handed over to Mount Pleasant Limited.</p>
<p>According to a police report dated January 7, 2026, from Gigiri Police Station, the Environment and Land Court order to the couple vacate the property had been executed under supervision of the Officer Commanding Station (OCS) Gigiri, with Mount Pleasant Ltd gaining possession of the property.</p>
<p>&#8220;The above court order has been executed today the 07/01/2026 under supervision of the OCS Gigiri and now the plaintiff Mount Pleasant Ltd has now gained possession of the property,&#8221; stated Officer Commanding Police Station Jennifer Mutuku in the official police document.</p>
<p>Mwangi&#8217;s appeal follows a landmark judgment by Environment and Land Court Judge Oscar Angote delivered on October 23, 2025, which found that Mwangi and his wife had no legal claim to the prime Muthaiga property and had unlawfully taken possession of land belonging to Mount Pleasant Limited.</p>
<p>In his detailed 150-page ruling, Justice Angote found glaring irregularities in the documents presented by the couple, including missing volume references, unsigned land registry entries, and inconsistencies in file numbers, which rendered their alleged 2012 purchase from the late President Daniel arap Moi null and void.</p>
<p>Justice Angote declared that the land, originally registered as L.R 214/20/1/1 and L.R 214/20/2, and later irregularly amalgamated into L.R 214/832, belongs to a private company Mount Pleasant Limited, not Dr. Mwangi and his wife.</p>
<p>The judge ordered the couple to pay Sh10 million in general damages for trespass, with interest accruing from the date of judgment until full payment, and to vacate the property immediately under threat of police enforcement.</p>
<p>&#8220;An award does hereby issue of general damages for trespass, assessed at Sh 10 Million. The 1st and 2nd Defendants (Mwangi and his wife Wangui) to pay interest on the above amount at court rates from the date of this Judgment until payment in full. The 1st and 2nd Defendants&#8217; counterclaim is dismissed with costs. The 1st and 2nd Defendants to pay the Plaintiff the costs of the suit,&#8221; Justice Angote ruled.</p>
<p>The decision restored ownership of the 3.733-acre property to Mount Pleasant Ltd, which traced its acquisition back to former Cabinet Minister Arthur Kinyanjui Magugu and his wife, Margaret.</p>
<p>According to company records, Mount Pleasant purchased the property in 2006 for Sh 130 million after the Magugus redeemed it from the National Bank of Kenya.</p>
<p>Dr. Mwangi, however, insisted that he legally purchased the same land in 2012 directly from the late President Moi for Sh320 million, presenting a conveyance allegedly executed by the former Head of State.</p>
<p>Mwangi claimed he had taken possession of the land and initiated amalgamation and survey approvals to consolidate the parcels.</p>
<p>But Justice Angote concluded that President Moi had lost ownership of the parcels back in 1982 when he transferred them to the Magugus, whose title was subsequently conveyed to Mount Pleasant Ltd.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any subsequent transaction purporting to return the property to Moi or to sell it again is null and void,&#8221; the ruling states.</p>
<p>The judgment highlighted glaring irregularities in the documents produced by Dr. Mwangi, including missing volume references, unsigned land-registry entries, and inconsistent file numbers, which the court found rendered the alleged 2013 conveyance invalid.</p>
<p>The court observed that any attempt to reassign the property to Mwangi and his wife after it had been legally transferred to the Magugus in 1982, and subsequently to Mount Pleasant Limited, was invalid.</p>
<p>Consequently, the Chief Land Registrar and the National Land Commission were directed to expunge Mwangi&#8217;s title and restore the original ownership to Mount Pleasant Ltd.</p>
<p>Justice Angote further issued a permanent injunction barring the defendants, or their agents, from accessing or dealing with the property and ordered immediate vacation of the premises. Police assistance was authorized to enforce the eviction if necessary.</p>
<p>The court also awarded Mount Pleasant Ltd in profits of Sh500,000 per month from the date of unlawful occupation.</p>
<p>The case had been filed in 2020 by Mount Pleasant Ltd&#8217;s director, Anverali Mohamed Karmeli Amershi, against Equity CEO Mwangi, his wife, and others.</p>
<p>In his testimony before court, Amershi recounted how the company purchased the land from the Magugus, who had redeemed it from the National Bank of Kenya following a mortgage default.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our purchase price was Sh130 million. We took possession in 2006 and have been in continuous occupation since then,&#8221; Amershi testified.</p>
<p>&#8220;The defendants claim to have bought the land in 2012, but they never produced valid documentation to support that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amershi described repeated attempts by the Mwangi family to assert ownership, including alleged evictions of the company&#8217;s security personnel.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is not just about ownership; it&#8217;s about trespass and the unlawful takeover of property that does not belong to them,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Equity CEO Mwangi recounted his version of events in court, stating that he had purchased the property from the late President Moi in December 2012 and had paid a deposit of Sh32,060,000, with the balance of Sh200,000,000 completed thereafter.</p>
<p>He claimed that the former President personally &#8220;blessed&#8221; the sale at his Kabarnet Gardens residence.</p>
<p>&#8220;I conducted a search, verified all details, and completed a valuation before executing the agreement. By April 2013, the sale was complete,&#8221; Dr. Mwangi testified.</p>
<p>&#8220;We took possession, engaged security, and even constructed a boundary wall.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, the court noted that Mwangi failed to produce critical supporting documents, such as the alleged sale agreement with President Moi and evidence of payments for amalgamation and survey approvals.</p>
<p>The detailed judgment meticulously traced the ownership history of the parcels.Originally allocated to James Archibald Morrison during the colonial era, the land changed hands multiple times, ultimately being conveyed to the late President Moi by the 8th Duke of Portland&#8217;s estate in 1980.</p>
<p>Moi mortgaged the land to Standard Bank, which reconveyed it back to him in 1982 before selling it to the Magugus.</p>
<p>Mount Pleasant Ltd legally acquired the land from the Magugus in 2006, registering the transfer and paying all requisite stamp duties.</p>
<p>The company also applied for amalgamation of the two parcels and undertook sub-division approvals in compliance with Nairobi County regulations.</p>
<p>The Court of Appeal judges have listed Mwangi’s appeal for a case management conference within 30 days by which time the parties are expected to have filed their respective submissions, as well as their lists and bundles of authorities.</p></div>
<div class="adL"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/equity-bank-ceo-mwangi-and-his-wife-suffers-major-blow-in-bid-to-retain-sh1-billion-muthaiga-property/">Equity Bank CEO Mwangi and his wife Suffers Major Blow in Bid to Retain Sh1 Billion Muthaiga Property</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pride Inn, Bound by Religious Ban on Alcohol, Ordered to Pay Sh2.1 Million for Unpaid Drinks</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/pride-inn-bound-by-religious-ban-on-alcohol-ordered-to-pay-sh2-1-million-for-unpaid-drinks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 09:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol supply dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar management services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial contract ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeal Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex turpi causa doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotel alcohol policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya business litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral contract enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pride Inn Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious policy business case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sh2.1 million debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thatchmaanz Limited]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Pride Inn Limited, whose strict religious policy forbids handling alcoholic beverages, has been ordered by the Court of Appeal to pay Sh2,104,770 to Thatchmaanz Limited for supplying and managing alcohol at its Nairobi hotels. The three-judge bench comprising Justices W. Karanja, K. M&#8217;Inoti, and L. Achode dismissed Pride Inn&#8217;s appeal in a ruling that exposes [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/pride-inn-bound-by-religious-ban-on-alcohol-ordered-to-pay-sh2-1-million-for-unpaid-drinks/">Pride Inn, Bound by Religious Ban on Alcohol, Ordered to Pay Sh2.1 Million for Unpaid Drinks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn Limited, whose strict religious policy forbids handling alcoholic beverages, has been ordered by the Court of Appeal to pay Sh2,104,770 to Thatchmaanz Limited for supplying and managing alcohol at its Nairobi hotels.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The three-judge bench comprising Justices W. Karanja, K. M&#8217;Inoti, and L. Achode dismissed Pride Inn&#8217;s appeal in a ruling that exposes the tension between religious principles and commercial profit, finding that the hotel chain cannot escape debts from an arrangement it designed, approved, and profited from for seven months.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The judgment reveals how Pride Inn&#8217;s management devised an elaborate scheme to sell alcohol without physically handling it, allowing the company to boost revenues while theoretically maintaining its proprietors&#8217; religious sensibilities.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">But when payment became due, the hotel claimed the entire operation was unauthorized and illegal.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;The entire essence of this model was that the Defendant did not wish to handle the alcoholic beverages yet wanted to avail them to its customers and patrons,&#8221; the trial judge noted, capturing what critics may view as corporate hypocrisy dressed in religious garb.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The controversy began in early 2014 when Pride Inn&#8217;s strict no-alcohol policy created what the company acknowledged was a serious financial problem.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">According to Anthony Ngunga, who served as Pride Inn&#8217;s Chief Executive Officer from February to December 2014, the religious restriction had &#8220;adversely affected its revenue streams.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Court documents reveal that Ngunga held meetings with Pride Inn&#8217;s top leadership, including Chairman Shabir Kassam and Managing Director Hasnain Noorani, to discuss &#8220;the need to raise revenue for the appellant by allowing the sale of alcohol.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The solution they crafted was ingenious in its attempt to split moral responsibility from financial benefit.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Rather than abandon their religious stance or continue losing money, Pride Inn&#8217;s board approved bringing in a third party to handle all physical aspects of alcohol sales.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Ngunga testified that he proposed Edward Ahn, director of Thatchmaanz Limited, who had experience in the bar and restaurant industry.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">In April 2014, a meeting attended by Pride Inn&#8217;s Managing Director sealed the arrangement.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Under the oral agreement, Thatchmaanz would supply alcoholic beverages to Pride Inn&#8217;s Nairobi hotels, construct and operate bars, hire staff, and bill the hotel directly for alcohol consumed by customers.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn would impose a service charge on sales but would not touch the bottles or handle the money directly.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The contract was to run for three years, from May 2014 to May 2017, with renewal provisions to allow Thatchmaanz to recover its investment in bar construction and equipment.</p>
<h2><strong>The Operation: Bars, Staff, and Booming Business</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Thatchmaanz moved quickly. By the end of May 2014, the company had established a complete bar unit at Pride Inn&#8217;s Lantana Road location, stocked all Nairobi outlets with alcoholic beverages, and engaged qualified bar staff.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Operations commenced with what appeared to be full approval from Pride Inn&#8217;s management.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The business model seemed designed to satisfy everyone.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn&#8217;s proprietors could claim they didn&#8217;t &#8220;handle&#8221; alcohol while their hotels offered comprehensive bar services to customers.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Thatchmaanz would build a steady supply relationship with a premium hotel chain. Customers would enjoy drinks at Pride Inn establishments.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Moses Mahavi, who worked as Bar Manager for Thatchmaanz, testified that his duties included ensuring supply of alcoholic beverages whenever needed by Pride Inn&#8217;s hotels and restaurants.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;The appellant also required the respondent to supply alcoholic beverages to any of its guests outside of the main hotel premises, who required it, through the outside catering offered by the appellant,&#8221; he stated.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Evidence showed that suppliers delivered alcoholic beverages directly to Pride Inn&#8217;s premises, where they were verified by the hotel&#8217;s security officers who issued gate passes. Hotel staff conducted further verification.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The entire operation was integrated into Pride Inn&#8217;s business, from security protocols to customer service.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Michael Kimitho Kamau, Pride Inn&#8217;s General Manager at the time, corroborated this account.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">He testified that he was &#8220;aware that the directors of Pride Inn Hotels were in discussions to allow the sale of alcohol in the Nairobi units&#8221; and that &#8220;they entered into an agreement to allow an independent vendor to supply the alcohol to be sold in the units and in turn to be paid independently by the Hotel.&#8221;</p>
<h2><strong>When the Money Stopped Flowing</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The first signs of trouble emerged in July 2014,just two months into operations.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Despite alcohol flowing freely at Pride Inn establishments and revenue presumably increasing, invoices dating from May 19, 2014, remained unpaid.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Edward Ahn testified that he contacted Ngunga to query why payments had not been made despite repeated assurances.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Ngunga met with Kamau and requested him to prepare all invoices and send them to Pride Inn&#8217;s financial controller for &#8220;prompt settlement.&#8221; The settlement never came.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">By November 2014, with debts mounting and patience exhausted, Thatchmaanz threatened to terminate the arrangement. Ngunga asked Ahn to reconsider.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">In December 2014, a crucial meeting was held at Pride Inn&#8217;s Westlands office, attended by the hotel&#8217;s Managing Director Noorani, Chief Finance Officer, Ahn, and Ngunga.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">According to testimony, the meeting resolved that outstanding invoices totaling approximately Sh1,500,000 would be settled within one week, and Thatchmaanz would continue supplying alcoholic drinks and running the bars.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">On December 2, 2014, just days after this meeting, Ngunga ceased employment with Pride Inn. The promised payment never materialized.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">On December 16, 2014, Pride Inn made a partial payment of Sh322,200 by cheque,an amount that would later prove crucial in establishing the hotel&#8217;s acknowledgment of the debt. But that was all Thatchmaanz would receive.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">By the time operations ceased, unpaid invoices totaled Sh2,104,770. Thatchmaanz had also invested Sh1,000,000 in bar construction and equipment, plus Sh648,000 in staff salaries.</p>
<h2 class="text-text-100 mt-3 -mb-1 text-[1.125rem] font-bold"><strong>The Defense: &#8220;We Never Authorized This&#8221;</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">When sued in the High Court, Pride Inn mounted a defense that struck at the foundations of the arrangement its own board had approved.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The hotel claimed any purported contract with Thatchmaanz was undertaken without company authority and could not bind it.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Nicholas Ochieng, Pride Inn&#8217;s General Manager, provided the company&#8217;s official position: &#8220;It was the company&#8217;s policy not to engage in the sale of alcoholic beverages in any of its hotel branches and at no point did the company obtain a license as required by law to sell alcoholic beverages in its premises as alleged by the respondent.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">He added that if Thatchmaanz had entered into an oral contract with Ngunga, &#8220;then that was a private agreement that the company was not privy to and therefore, is not bound by it.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn also invoked the legal doctrine of ex turpi causa non oritur actio—the principle that courts should not enforce illegal contracts.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The hotel argued the arrangement was illegal because its premises were not licensed to sell alcohol under the Nairobi City County Alcoholic Drinks Control and Licensing Act, 2014.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The irony was sharp: Pride Inn was simultaneously claiming it never authorized alcohol sales while arguing those very sales were illegal.</p>
<h2 class="text-text-100 mt-3 -mb-1 text-[1.125rem] font-bold"><strong>The Inconvenient Evidence</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn&#8217;s defense faced several devastating problems. First, the hotel conspicuously failed to call Managing Director Hasnain Noorani to testify, despite him being identified as a key participant in the April 2014 meeting that birthed the arrangement and the December 2014 meeting that promised payment.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;The unrebutted testimonies of PW1 and PW2, coupled with evidence of performance including the establishment of the bar complete with barmen, stocking of beverages, and a part-payment in the form of a cheque of Kshs. 322,000 issued by the appellant, support the existence of an oral agreement,&#8221; the Court of Appeal noted.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Second, evidence showed that Pride Inn&#8217;s own General Manager, Kamau, had visited Nairobi City Hall in May 2014 to obtain licenses for the units to sell alcohol.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">He paid inspection fees and received a receipt dated February 4, 2015. Kamau testified that they were told the Alcohol Licensing Board had not yet been formed but were advised to pay fees and proceed with sales pending the Board&#8217;s appointment.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Third, the partial payment of Sh322,200 contradicted Pride Inn&#8217;s claim of non-authorization.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Courts recognize that partial payment typically constitutes acknowledgment of debt.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Fourth, and perhaps most damning, Thatchmaanz presented evidence that after terminating the arrangement, Pride Inn hired Thatchmaanz&#8217;s former Bar Manager, Moses Mahavi, to continue running the bar at Lantana Road. Ahn testified that &#8220;the appellant continues to operate the business of selling alcoholic drinks.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">This evidence painted a picture of a company that approved alcohol sales at the highest level, benefited from them financially, made partial payment acknowledging the debt, continued the business after the dispute—but refused to pay the supplier who made it all possible.</p>
<h2 class="text-text-100 mt-3 -mb-1 text-[1.125rem] font-bold"><strong>The Court&#8217;s Verdict: You Can&#8217;t Have It Both Ways</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The High Court, presided over by Justice Tuiyott, ruled in favor of Thatchmaanz in February 2019, awarding Sh2,104,770 plus interest. Pride Inn appealed to the Court of Appeal.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The appellate judges began by addressing whether a valid contract existed.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">They outlined requirements for oral contracts: valid and legally enforceable terms, essential elements like offer and acceptance, and compliance with laws and regulations.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;Going by the conduct of the parties herein, and having regard to the common course of natural events and human conduct in relation to the prevailing facts of this particular case, we are convinced that there was an orally binding contract between the appellant and the respondent,&#8221; the Court of Appeal declared.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The judges found that the arrangement was not a conventional sale of goods but rather &#8220;a hybrid commercial arrangement &#8211; a service and supply contract, designed to allow the appellant to offer alcohol to patrons without violating its internal restrictions.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">This finding rejected Pride Inn&#8217;s argument that the Sale of Goods Act applied and had been violated.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">On the illegality argument, the court was equally unimpressed.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;The duty to obtain the licence lay with the appellant, since the sale occurred within its premises and for the benefit of its clientele,&#8221; the judges ruled.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">They noted that Pride Inn&#8217;s own General Manager had taken steps to obtain licenses, and that Section 56(b) of the relevant Act allowed a nine-month transitional period for compliance.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The County Government had allowed Pride Inn to proceed with sales pending appointment of the Licensing Board.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;In our view, the appellant cannot rely on the doctrine of &#8216;ex turpi causa non oritur actio&#8217; where it has been proved that the duty was upon it to ensure that it had obtained the licence before it allowed the sale of alcoholic beverages in its premises,&#8221; the court stated.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The judges characterized the absence of a license as &#8220;a regulatory lapse for which the appellant bore responsibility&#8221; rather than fundamental illegality that would void the contract.</p>
<h2 class="text-text-100 mt-3 -mb-1 text-[1.125rem] font-bold"><strong>The Message: Religious Principles Don&#8217;t Trump Legal Obligations</strong></h2>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The Court of Appeal&#8217;s ruling sends a clear message about corporate accountability. Companies cannot structure elaborate arrangements to achieve moral distance from activities their principles prohibit, profit substantially from those activities, and then invoke those same principles to escape financial obligations.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The judgment also addresses the limits of the ex turpi causa defense. A party cannot claim a contract is illegal due to missing licenses when that party bore the duty to obtain those licenses, took steps to do so, and was given transitional permission by authorities.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">On damages, the court found that Thatchmaanz had &#8220;not only pleaded special damages but also strictly proved them&#8221; through unpaid invoices totaling Sh2,104,770 covering the period from May to December 2014.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn&#8217;s final gambit, attempting to hold Anthony Ngunga personally liable through third-party proceedings also failed.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The court noted that Pride Inn had sought leave to serve the third-party notice by substituted service but never filed the required application or effected service.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;There is no evidence that third-party proceedings were prosecuted in the trial court,&#8221; the judges observed.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Pride Inn Limited has been ordered to pay the full judgment amount of Sh2,104,770 plus costs and interest to Thatchmaanz Limited, bringing closure to a dispute that began when the hotel&#8217;s bar taps were flowing but its payments had run dry.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/pride-inn-bound-by-religious-ban-on-alcohol-ordered-to-pay-sh2-1-million-for-unpaid-drinks/">Pride Inn, Bound by Religious Ban on Alcohol, Ordered to Pay Sh2.1 Million for Unpaid Drinks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBK Warns Against Using Banknotes for Bouquets, Decorations Ahead of Valentine’s Day</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/cbk-warns-against-using-banknotes-for-bouquets-decorations-ahead-of-valentines-day/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 17:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banknotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Bank of Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[currency warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decorative cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defacing currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya Shilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money bouquets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine’s Day]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Central Bank of Kenya has issued a stern warning to the public over the increasing use of banknotes in decorative arrangements, saying the practice violates the law and undermines the integrity of the national currency. In a public notice dated February 2, 2026, the regulator expressed concern over a rising trend where Kenya Shilling [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/cbk-warns-against-using-banknotes-for-bouquets-decorations-ahead-of-valentines-day/">CBK Warns Against Using Banknotes for Bouquets, Decorations Ahead of Valentine’s Day</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Central Bank of Kenya has issued a stern warning to the public over the increasing use of banknotes in decorative arrangements, saying the practice violates the law and undermines the integrity of the national currency.</p>
<p>In a public notice dated February 2, 2026, the regulator expressed concern over a rising trend where Kenya Shilling notes are being folded, glued, stapled, and pinned together to create cash flower bouquets, money arrangements, and ornamental displays, particularly during celebrations such as Valentine&#8217;s Day.</p>
<p>The Bank said such practices render banknotes unfit for circulation and interfere with automated banking systems.</p>
<p>&#8220;The use of adhesives, pins, staples, and similar materials damages banknotes and interferes with the efficient operation of cash-handling and processing equipment, including automated teller machines (ATMs), cash counting machines, and sorting equipment,&#8221; CBK stated in the notice.</p>
<p>The regulator added that damaged currency leads to increased rejection rates during processing and forces premature withdrawal and replacement of notes, creating unnecessary costs for both the public and the Bank.</p>
<p>While acknowledging that giving cash as a gift is acceptable, CBK emphasized that the presentation method must not compromise the currency&#8217;s condition.</p>
<p>&#8220;CBK does not object to the use of cash as a gift, such use should not involve any action that alters, damages, or defaces banknotes,&#8221; the notice read.</p>
<p>The Bank stressed that currency must remain capable of performing its essential functions as a medium of exchange, unit of account, and store of value.</p>
<p>CBK also reminded Kenyans that defacing currency is a criminal offense under Section 367 of the Penal Code.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any person who willfully defaces, mutilates, or in any way impairs any currency note issued by lawful authority commits an offence under the Penal Code,&#8221; the notice warned.</p>
<p>The regulator has called on the public to adopt alternative methods of presenting monetary gifts that do not damage banknotes.</p>
<p>&#8220;CBK therefore urges the public to refrain from practices that compromise the integrity of Kenya Shilling banknotes and to adopt alternative, non-damaging methods when presenting monetary gifts,&#8221; the statement said.</p>
<p>The Central Bank said it will continue public awareness campaigns and stakeholder engagement to protect the quality and public confidence in Kenya Shilling banknotes.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/cbk-warns-against-using-banknotes-for-bouquets-decorations-ahead-of-valentines-day/">CBK Warns Against Using Banknotes for Bouquets, Decorations Ahead of Valentine’s Day</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Win for Musician Nonini as High Court Upholds Sh4M Copyright Award</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/big-win-for-musician-nonini-as-high-court-upholds-sh4m-copyright-award/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 17:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Mutinda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubert Nakitare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sylvix Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wee Kamu]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4523</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It is a big win for Genge music icon Nonini after the High Court upheld a Sh 4 million award against Sylvix Electronics for illegally using his song &#8220;Wee Kamu.&#8221; In alandmark judgment by Justice Linus P Kassan not only maintained the substantial damages for the artist born Hubert Nakitare but also set important precedents [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/big-win-for-musician-nonini-as-high-court-upholds-sh4m-copyright-award/">Big Win for Musician Nonini as High Court Upholds Sh4M Copyright Award</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a big win for Genge music icon Nonini after the High Court upheld a Sh 4 million award against Sylvix Electronics for illegally using his song &#8220;Wee Kamu.&#8221;</p>
<p>In alandmark judgment by Justice Linus P Kassan not only maintained the substantial damages for the artist born Hubert Nakitare but also set important precedents about who bears responsibility when copyrighted material is published without authorization on social media platforms.</p>
<p>While content creator Brian Mutinda walked away cleared of liability, the ruling represents a major win for Nonini and the broader creative industry in protecting intellectual property rights.</p>
<p>The facts of the infringement were never in dispute.</p>
<p>A video featuring Nonini&#8217;s popular track had been posted on Sylvix Electronics&#8217; social media account without the musician&#8217;s consent, clearly violating his exclusive rights to control how his music is used.</p>
<p>Justice Kassan was unequivocal about the violation that: &#8220;The evidence on record clearly indicate that the Plaintiff&#8217;s song had a copyright or license which was infringed. This is not disputed by either of the parties.&#8221;</p>
<p>The court heard that Nonini had properly registered his copyright for &#8220;Wee Kamu&#8221; and produced a certificate proving his ownership.</p>
<p>&#8220;The song &#8216;Wee Kamu&#8217; belonged to the Plaintiff and he produced a certificate to prove this,&#8221; the judge confirmed.</p>
<p>The disputed video, which was screened during court proceedings, depicted Mutinda welcoming a lady to watch a branded television screen while Nonini&#8217;s song played in the background, featuring the lyrics &#8220;leo niko kwa keja sitoki hapa, kwa hivyo ukitaka wee kamu.&#8221;</p>
<p>What made this case particularly significant was the court&#8217;s analysis of who should bear responsibility when content is modified and published on digital platforms.</p>
<p>The video appeared on Sylvix Electronics&#8217; account, not on Mutinda&#8217;s personal social media. This distinction proved critical to the court&#8217;s reasoning.</p>
<p>Justice Kassan posed the central question: &#8220;Does the 1st Appellant( the content creator0 have authority to post videos to the 2nd Respondent electronic account?&#8221;</p>
<p>The answer shaped the entire judgment. Without evidence that Mutinda controlled Sylvix Electronics&#8217; social media presence or authorized the posting, the court found it unjust to hold him personally liable.</p>
<p>&#8220;This therefore means that the Appellant did not have control on the 2nd Defendant account and this being the case, the 2nd Defendant can post anything he/it wants,&#8221; Justice Kassan found.</p>
<p>&#8220;Should the Appellant be punished for what the 2nd Defendant has posted in its account?&#8221;The judge then posed.<br />
C<br />
The ruling has significant implications for Kenya&#8217;s booming content creation industry.</p>
<p>Justice Kassan warned that holding creators liable for unauthorized modifications by third parties could stifle creative expression.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is true that in this era of technology, many young men and women are engaging into the business of content creation,&#8221; the judge observed.</p>
<p>&#8220;If their contents are synchronized and posted illegally by other institutions without their consent, should they still be found liable?</p>
<p>To me, this will greatly affect art or music in general.&#8221;</p>
<p>The court rejected the trial magistrate&#8217;s conclusion that Mutinda must have added the song simply because he appeared in the video, calling such reasoning &#8220;subjective and imagination that is bereft of evidence.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a particularly memorable phrase, Justice Kassan added: &#8220;no one, even the devil can read the mind of a man.&#8221;</p>
<p>While clearing Mutinda, the High Court maintained the full Sh 4 million award against Sylvix Electronics, finding it both reasonable and appropriate.</p>
<p>&#8220;The conclusion of the above is that this Appeal succeeds as against the Appellant,&#8221; Justice Kassan ruled, before directing that &#8220;this award shall only be against the 2nd Respondent.&#8221;</p>
<p>The company was also ordered to pay the costs of the appeal, compounding its financial liability.</p>
<p>Critically, Sylvix Electronics failed to participate in either the original proceedings or the appeal, leaving unanswered how Nonini&#8217;s copyrighted song ended up synchronized with content on its platform.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Second Defendant did not participate in the lower Court proceedings and in this Appeal,&#8221; the judge noted.</p>
<p>For Nonini, one of the architects of Kenya&#8217;s Genge music movement, the judgment validates years of advocacy for stronger artist protections.</p>
<p>The Sh 4 million award sends a clear message that Kenyan courts will enforce copyright laws and impose meaningful penalties on violators.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/big-win-for-musician-nonini-as-high-court-upholds-sh4m-copyright-award/">Big Win for Musician Nonini as High Court Upholds Sh4M Copyright Award</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mbadi: Kenyans Earning Ksh30,000 Should Not Pay Tax</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/mbadi-kenyans-earning-ksh30000-should-not-pay-tax/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 16:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 salary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of living Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital news Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government taxes Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Mbadi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya finance bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya tax relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenyan workers tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ksh30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low income earners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE exemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary tax Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reforms Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury CS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4519</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a sweeping announcement that could transform the lives of millions of struggling families, National Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi has declared war on poverty taxes, unveiling plans to completely exempt Kenyans earning Ksh30,000 or less from paying income tax. The bold proposal, backed by President William Ruto, would put cash directly back into the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/mbadi-kenyans-earning-ksh30000-should-not-pay-tax/">Mbadi: Kenyans Earning Ksh30,000 Should Not Pay Tax</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a sweeping announcement that could transform the lives of millions of struggling families, National Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi has declared war on poverty taxes, unveiling plans to completely exempt Kenyans earning Ksh30,000 or less from paying income tax.</p>
<p>The bold proposal, backed by President William Ruto, would put cash directly back into the pockets of over 4 million workers who currently surrender a portion of their modest salaries to the taxman each month, money they desperately need for food, rent, and school fees.</p>
<p>&#8220;Anyone earning below Ksh30,000 should not pay PAYE. It is simply not fair,&#8221; Mbadi told a packed Budget and Privatisation Forum in Kiambu drawing applause from attendees.</p>
<p>Then, with characteristic candour, he added: &#8220;I earn a million shillings let the government come for me and my fellow MPs instead.&#8221;</p>
<p>For Jane Wanjiku, a shopkeeper in Nairobi&#8217;s Kawangware estate who earns Ksh28,000 monthly, the news feels almost too good to be true.</p>
<p>After rent, transport, and feeding her two children, she&#8217;s often left with barely enough to see the month through.</p>
<p>&#8220;If they stop taking tax from my salary, that&#8217;s an extra Ksh2,000 in my hands every month,&#8221; she says.</p>
<p>&#8220;That could pay school fees, or buy milk and bread when we run out. It would change everything.&#8221;</p>
<p>She&#8217;s not alone. Treasury data shows that approximately 1.5 million salaried workers earn Ksh30,000 or less, with another 2 million earning just slightly above that threshold.</p>
<p>Combined, the proposed tax relief could benefit upwards of 4 million Kenyans,a substantial segment of the country&#8217;s formal workforce.</p>
<p><em><strong>&#8220;This Is Survival Money, Not Taxable Income&#8221;</strong></em></p>
<p>Mbadi was unequivocal in his reasoning: a Ksh30,000 salary is not wealth but it&#8217;s survival.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is barely enough to cover rent, food, transport, and school fees for a family,&#8221; he explained.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is not the kind of income where the government should still be seeking to levy taxes. These are hardworking Kenyans just trying to get by.&#8221;</p>
<p>Under the current system, anyone earning above Ksh24,000 per month falls into the taxable bracket, meaning even the lowest-paid formal workers lose a slice of their pay to PAYE (Pay As You Earn) deductions.</p>
<p>The Treasury&#8217;s new plan would not only raise that threshold to Ksh30,000 but also introduce a 5 percent tax reduction for those earning between Ksh30,000 and Ksh50,000, offering relief to lower-middle-income earners as well.</p>
<p>Beyond the immediate relief for families, economists say the move could inject much-needed energy into Kenya&#8217;s sluggish economy.</p>
<p>&#8220;When low-income earners have more money in their pockets, they spend it — on food, clothes, transport, school supplies,&#8221; says Dr. Mercy Kiprotich, an economist at Strathmore University.</p>
<p>&#8220;That spending powers small businesses, market vendors, and local suppliers. It&#8217;s a direct stimulus to the grassroots economy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mbadi echoed this sentiment: &#8220;We want to give you something in your pocket so that we can spur demand in the economy, because it is struggling.&#8221;</p>
<p>Local traders and matatu operators have reported declining sales in recent months as households tighten their belts amid rising fuel costs, inflation, and stagnant wages.</p>
<p>A tax break of this magnitude could reverse that trend.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s a flip side. To offset the revenue loss from exempting millions of low earners, Mbadi says the government will intensify efforts to bring informal earners into the tax system and improve compliance among higher earners.</p>
<p>&#8220;We cannot continue to have a situation where only a small percentage of Kenyans carry the tax burden,&#8221; he cautioned.</p>
<p>&#8220;We will broaden the base, but we will do it fairly, without heavy-handedness.&#8221;</p>
<p>This could mean stricter enforcement for businesses, professionals, and high-net-worth individuals who operate outside the formal payroll, as well as digital tools to track income more effectively.</p>
<p>Still, Mbadi insists the focus remains on fairness: &#8220;Let those who can afford to pay, pay. But let those who are struggling, breathe.&#8221;</p>
<p>The proposal will now head to Parliament as part of the upcoming Finance Bill, where it will face debate and scrutiny from lawmakers.</p>
<p>If approved, the changes could take effect as early as July 2026, the start of the next financial year.</p>
<p>For millions of Kenyans like Jane Wanjiku, the wait will be anxious but hopeful.</p>
<p>&#8220;I pray they pass it,&#8221; she says. &#8220;Because for people like us, every shilling counts.&#8221;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/mbadi-kenyans-earning-ksh30000-should-not-pay-tax/">Mbadi: Kenyans Earning Ksh30,000 Should Not Pay Tax</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Treasury Investment Secretary Esther Koimett Joins Kenya Airways Board Representing Lenders</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/former-treasury-investment-secretary-esther-koimett-joins-kenya-airways-board-representing-lenders/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 06:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airline restructuring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business news Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esther Koimett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya Airways board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya Airways lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya Airways restructuring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenyan aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KQ Lenders Company 2017 Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-executive director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safaricom director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Investment Secretary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kenya Airways Plc has appointed former Treasury Investment Secretary and long-serving Safaricom director Ms. Esther Jepkemboi Koimett, CBS, as a non-executive director representing the airline’s multibillion-shilling lenders, reinforcing creditor oversight at the national carrier as it continues its post-restructuring recovery. In a public announcement issued on Monday, the airline said Ms. Koimett will represent KQ [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/former-treasury-investment-secretary-esther-koimett-joins-kenya-airways-board-representing-lenders/">Former Treasury Investment Secretary Esther Koimett Joins Kenya Airways Board Representing Lenders</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-start="376" data-end="709">Kenya Airways Plc has appointed former Treasury Investment Secretary and long-serving Safaricom director Ms. Esther Jepkemboi Koimett, CBS, as a non-executive director representing the airline’s multibillion-shilling lenders, reinforcing creditor oversight at the national carrier as it continues its post-restructuring recovery.</p>
<p data-start="711" data-end="909">In a public announcement issued on Monday, the airline said Ms. Koimett will represent KQ Lenders Company 2017 Limited on the board, with the appointment taking effect from January 26, 2026.</p>
<p data-start="911" data-end="1106">“This announcement is made pursuant to the Capital Markets (Securities) (Public Offers, Listing and Disclosures) Regulations, 2023, promulgated under the Capital Markets Act,” Kenya Airways said.</p>
<p data-start="1108" data-end="1349">“The Board of Directors of Kenya Airways Plc hereby announces the appointment of Ms. Esther Jepkemboi Koimett, CBS, as a non-executive director of the Company (representing KQ Lenders Company 2017 Limited on the Board),” the statement added.</p>
<p data-start="1351" data-end="1667">The appointment places one of Kenya’s most experienced public-sector investment managers at the centre of governance at the airline, whose ownership and control structure shifted significantly following a debt-for-equity restructuring that converted billions of shillings owed to lenders into shareholding interests.</p>
<p data-start="1710" data-end="2016">KQ Lenders Company 2017 Limited represents local and international lenders who extended financing to Kenya Airways during earlier restructuring efforts, particularly as the airline struggled with mounting losses, fleet financing obligations and operational disruptions exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic.</p>
<p data-start="2018" data-end="2193">The lenders emerged as a critical stakeholder bloc following the restructuring, joining the Government of Kenya and strategic partner KLM in steering the airline’s turnaround.</p>
<p data-start="2195" data-end="2383">Ms. Koimett’s appointment is expected to strengthen lenders’ representation at board level while bringing deep expertise in public finance, investment structuring and corporate governance.</p>
<p data-start="2425" data-end="2641">According to the announcement, Ms. Koimett is “an accomplished public servant with over 35 years’ experience spanning across investment promotion, banking, privatisation, public enterprise reform, and public policy.”</p>
<p data-start="2643" data-end="2867">She has played a central role in “the structuring and execution of major strategic transactions and initiatives undertaken by the Government of the Republic of Kenya,” particularly during her tenure at the National Treasury.</p>
<p data-start="2869" data-end="3145">Ms. Koimett previously served as Investment Secretary and Director-General for Public Investments and Portfolio Management at the National Treasury, a role that placed her in charge of oversight of State corporations, government shareholding, and major public investments.</p>
<p data-start="3147" data-end="3435">She has also held senior positions as Principal Secretary in the State Department of Transport, and Principal Secretary in the State Department of Broadcasting and Telecommunications, roles that exposed her to infrastructure development, aviation policy, and regulatory oversight.</p>
<p data-start="3437" data-end="3701">Earlier in her career, she served as Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Tourism and Information, and as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Kenya Post Office Savings Bank, giving her extensive exposure to financial services management.</p>
<p data-start="3739" data-end="3972">Ms. Koimett is not new to the national carrier. She has previously served on the Kenya Airways Plc board representing the Government of Kenya, during a period marked by intense negotiations around state support and restructuring.</p>
<p data-start="3974" data-end="4154">Her return to the board, this time representing lenders, underscores the shifting balance of influence at the airline following the recapitalisation and debt restructuring process.</p>
<p data-start="4199" data-end="4293">Beyond the public sector, Ms. Koimett has built a strong profile in private-sector governance.</p>
<p data-start="4295" data-end="4486">She currently serves as Chairperson of M-Pesa Holdings Company Limited, one of Kenya’s most strategically significant fintech entities, and Chairperson of AAR Insurance Kenya Limited.</p>
<p data-start="4488" data-end="4692">She is also a non-executive director at Car &amp; General, a listed industrial and consumer goods firm, and has previously served on multiple corporate boards across banking, insurance and infrastructure.</p>
<p data-start="4694" data-end="4899">Her long association with Safaricom Plc, where she has served as a director, has further cemented her reputation as a seasoned boardroom leader with experience overseeing complex, regulated businesses.</p>
<p data-start="4944" data-end="5218">Ms. Koimett holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree and an MBA from the University of Nairobi, an Advanced Management Programme (AMP) certificate from Strathmore University, and is a member of the Institute of Investment and Financial Analysts (IIFA), Kenya.</p>
<p data-start="5220" data-end="5335">She was awarded the Chief of the Order of the Burning Spear (CBS) in recognition of her service to the country.</p>
<p data-start="5369" data-end="5510">“The Board, Management and Staff of Kenya Airways Plc hereby congratulate Ms. Koimett on her appointment to this new role,” the airline said.</p>
<p data-start="5512" data-end="5602">The announcement was signed by Company Secretary Habil A. Waswani on January 26, 2026.</p>
<p data-start="5604" data-end="5873">Kenya Airways noted that the disclosure was issued with the approval of the Capital Markets Authority, adding that “as a matter of policy, the Capital Markets Authority assumes no responsibility for the correctness of the statements appearing in this announcement.”</p>
<p data-start="5875" data-end="6119" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="">Ms. Koimett’s appointment comes at a critical phase for Kenya Airways as it seeks to stabilise operations, rebuild profitability and align the interests of government, strategic partners and lenders in steering the airline’s long-term recovery.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/former-treasury-investment-secretary-esther-koimett-joins-kenya-airways-board-representing-lenders/">Former Treasury Investment Secretary Esther Koimett Joins Kenya Airways Board Representing Lenders</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump Eyes Billions in Venezuelan Oil Investment</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/trump-eyes-billions-in-venezuelan-oil-investment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 17:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConocoPhillips Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America energy news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maduro capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mar-a-Lago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump Venezuela oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US oil investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela political crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuelan oil reserves]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hours after US forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in a dramatic raid on January 3, President Donald Trump unveiled an ambitious vision: American oil companies would spend billions to rebuild Venezuela&#8217;s crumbling oil infrastructure and tap into the world&#8217;s largest proven petroleum reserves. &#8220;We&#8217;re going to have our very large United States oil companies, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/trump-eyes-billions-in-venezuelan-oil-investment/">Trump Eyes Billions in Venezuelan Oil Investment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Hours after US forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in a dramatic raid on January 3, President Donald Trump unveiled an ambitious vision: American oil companies would spend billions to rebuild Venezuela&#8217;s crumbling oil infrastructure and tap into the world&#8217;s largest proven petroleum reserves.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;We&#8217;re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country,&#8221; Trump declared from his Mar-a-Lago estate.</p>
<p>Washington has indicted Maduro on narco-terrorism charges, but the Venezuelan government has said for months that Trump and the U.S. were seeking to take the country&#8217;s vast natural resources.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Venezuela sits atop a staggering 303 billion barrels of oil, roughly 17 percent of global reserves.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Yet the country currently produces only about 1.1 million barrels per day, a fraction of the 3.5 million barrels it pumped in the late 1990s before socialist governments under Hugo Chávez and Maduro nationalized the industry and allowed it to deteriorate.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Trump&#8217;s pitch centers on reclaiming what he characterized as stolen American assets.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;We built Venezuela&#8217;s oil industry with American talent, drive and skill, and the socialist regime stole it from us,&#8221; he asserted, referencing the 1970s nationalization that cost US companies billions in assets.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Despite Trump&#8217;s confident proclamations, major American oil companies have responded with notable silence or carefully worded statements.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Chevron, the only US energy giant currently operating in Venezuela, issued a bland statement emphasizing employee safety and regulatory compliance.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">ConocoPhillips said it was monitoring developments but called it &#8220;premature to speculate on any future business activities or investments.&#8221;</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">According to Politico, the Trump administration had already asked US oil companies if they were interested in returning to Venezuela, but the companies firmly declined.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The hesitation is rooted in cold economics and geopolitical uncertainty.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Venezuela&#8217;s oil is extra-heavy crude, thick, viscous, and expensive to extract and refine. While US Gulf Coast refineries were built specifically to handle this type of oil, the infrastructure in Venezuela has been neglected for decades.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">&#8220;The issue is not just that the infrastructure is in bad shape, but it&#8217;s mostly about how do you get foreign companies to start pouring money in before they have a clear perspective on the political stability, the contract situation and the like,&#8221; explained Francisco Monaldi, director of the Latin American energy program at Rice University.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Adding to companies&#8217; wariness is the current global oil glut, with prices too low to justify the massive investment required. Nearby Guyana offers a more attractive alternative, lighter crude, lower taxes, and no state oil company to navigate.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The situation evokes uncomfortable parallels to post-invasion Iraq, where it took nearly two decades to revitalize the oil industry despite US involvement.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">Trump&#8217;s declaration that the US would temporarily &#8220;run the country&#8221; raised more questions than answers.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">While Secretary of State Marco Rubio later walked back suggestions of long-term occupation, uncertainty about Venezuela&#8217;s political transition remains the elephant in the boardroom.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">The geopolitical stakes are significant. Revitalizing Venezuelan oil could pressure Russia, which competes for the same heavy crude market, and reduce China&#8217;s influence in the country.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">But whether American companies will risk their capital on Trump&#8217;s vision, or wait for clearer signals from Venezuela&#8217;s murky political future remains the billion-dollar question.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]">For now, the world&#8217;s largest oil reserves sit in limbo, caught between a president&#8217;s ambitions and an industry&#8217;s cold calculation of risk versus reward.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/trump-eyes-billions-in-venezuelan-oil-investment/">Trump Eyes Billions in Venezuelan Oil Investment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think Twice Kenya Fined Sh700,000 for Using Minor’s Photos for Commercial Gain</title>
		<link>https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/think-twice-kenya-fined-sh700000-for-using-minors-photos-for-commercial-gain/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2025 11:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection Act Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minor’s images misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Think Twice Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unauthorized use of child photos]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://insiderbits.co.ke/?p=4231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Think Twice Kenya has been ordered to pay Sh700,000 in compensation after the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC) found the company unlawfully used a minor’s photographs for commercial gain without obtaining parental consent. In a determination issued under ODPC Complaint No. 0653 of 2025, the Data Commissioner ruled that the company breached the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/think-twice-kenya-fined-sh700000-for-using-minors-photos-for-commercial-gain/">Think Twice Kenya Fined Sh700,000 for Using Minor’s Photos for Commercial Gain</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think Twice Kenya has been ordered to pay Sh700,000 in compensation after the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC) found the company unlawfully used a minor’s photographs for commercial gain without obtaining parental consent.</p>
<p>In a determination issued under ODPC Complaint No. 0653 of 2025, the Data Commissioner ruled that the company breached the Data Protection Act, 2019 by publishing and circulating the child’s images across its social media platforms to promote its business activities.</p>
<p>The complaint was lodged on May 7, 2025, by the minor’s parent, who told the regulator that her daughter’s photographs had been collected and displayed online without her knowledge or approval.</p>
<p>According to the ODPC, the images were shared on Facebook and TikTok for over a year beginning May 2024.</p>
<p>Investigations by the regulator confirmed that the images were still active during the inquiry.</p>
<p>“Upon careful analysis of the evidence and applicable law, the Office found that indeed the minor’s images were still actively in use on TikTok and Facebook platforms,” the ruling reads.</p>
<p>The ODPC noted that Think Twice Kenya was formally notified of the complaint and warned that the alleged conduct, if proven, would amount to a violation of the Act.</p>
<p>However, the company failed to engage the process.</p>
<p>“Despite effective and prompt service of the notification of complaint, the Respondent remained unresponsive at all material times,” the Data Commissioner stated.</p>
<p>At the heart of the dispute was whether the company obtained valid consent from the child’s parent or guardian, as required when processing children’s personal data.</p>
<p>The Commissioner emphasized that consent must be express, informed and provable.</p>
<p>“Valid consent is a product of conscious decision-making and requires affirmative action. It should be demonstrable and capable of being proven,” the ruling states.</p>
<p>Under Kenyan law, the burden of proving consent rests with the data controller.</p>
<p>The ODPC found that Think Twice Kenya failed to meet this threshold.</p>
<p>“The Respondent herein failed, refused and/or neglected to furnish the Office with a response to the notification of complaint,” the Commissioner ruled, adding that the company therefore “failed to demonstrate that indeed the Complainant expressly consented to the use of her child’s images for marketing and advertising.”</p>
<p>The regulator further found that by publishing the images to promote its services, the company was advancing its own commercial interests.</p>
<p>“This constituted the use of the minor’s images for commercial purposes which required express consent,” the determination states.</p>
<p>As a result, the ODPC awarded compensation under Section 65 of the Data Protection Act, which allows damages for both financial and non-financial harm, including distress.</p>
<p>“The Respondent is hereby directed to compensate the Complainant the amount of Kenya Shillings Seven Hundred Thousand Only (Sh 700,000),” the Commissioner ordered.</p>
<p>In addition to the financial penalty, the Data Commissioner issued an Enforcement Notice against the company for failing to comply with its obligations as a data controller under the Act.</p>
<p>“Having found that the Respondent did not fulfill its obligations as a data controller to the Complainant as a data subject, the Office hereby orders for an enforcement notice to be issued,” the commissioner stated</p>
<p>The parties have 30 days to appeal the decision to the High Court of Kenya.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke/business/think-twice-kenya-fined-sh700000-for-using-minors-photos-for-commercial-gain/">Think Twice Kenya Fined Sh700,000 for Using Minor’s Photos for Commercial Gain</a> appeared first on <a href="https://insiderbits.co.ke">Insider Bits News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
